gcc-help archive
date index for December, 2016

This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 30, 2016
13:15 Re: -Wmissing-field-initializers got shot in the leg Jonathan Wakely
09:26 -Wmissing-field-initializers got shot in the leg Georg GCC User

December 28, 2016
01:27 Re: gcc on iMac running Sierra Jonathan Wakely

December 27, 2016
19:45 Re: OpenMP 4.0 offloading for intelmic target. Can not find to mkoffload. Ivan Kulagin
19:13 gcc on iMac running Sierra Richard Phillips
15:15 Re: OpenMP 4.0 offloading for intelmic target. Can not find to mkoffload. Alexander Monakov
14:04 OpenMP 4.0 offloading for intelmic target. Can not find to mkoffload. Ivan Kulagin

December 25, 2016
17:56 possible values of the --target switch of the configure script.‏ Atar

December 24, 2016
18:46 Re: Mixing C++11 atomics and OpenMP Andrew Haley
12:17 Re: Mixing C++11 atomics and OpenMP Michael Underhill
11:47 Re: Mixing C++11 atomics and OpenMP Andrew Haley
11:29 Re: Mixing C++11 atomics and OpenMP Andrew Haley
11:00 Mixing C++11 atomics and OpenMP Michael Underhill

December 23, 2016
20:15 Re: I have a problem/concern with the GCC website http://gcc.gnu.org/ Jonathan Wakely
18:38 Re: I have a problem/concern with the GCC website http://gcc.gnu.org/ Dennis Clarke
17:21 Re: I have a problem/concern with the GCC website http://gcc.gnu.org/ Jonathan Wakely
11:38 Re: I have a problem/concern with the GCC website http://gcc.gnu.org/ Dennis Clarke
11:20 Re: I have a problem/concern with the GCC website http://gcc.gnu.org/ Marc Glisse
10:50 Re: I have a problem/concern with the GCC website http://gcc.gnu.org/ Dennis Clarke
10:45 Re: I have a problem/concern with the GCC website http://gcc.gnu.org/ Marc Glisse
10:38 I have a problem/concern with the GCC website http://gcc.gnu.org/ Dennis Clarke

December 21, 2016
19:12 Re: Problem with std::endl, left-shift operator and valarray Jonathan Wakely
17:35 Re: Problem with std::endl, left-shift operator and valarray Sébastien Aubry
16:46 Re: Problem with std::endl, left-shift operator and valarray Jonathan Wakely
16:27 Problem with std::endl, left-shift operator and valarray Sébastien Aubry
07:46 Re: Empty destructor definition disables optimization. Marc Glisse
07:36 Re: [libstdc++-v3] lib64 folder is ignored when building x86_64-*-linux-gnu multilib cross toolchain Dmitry Perov
01:17 Empty destructor definition disables optimization. Juan Cabrera

December 20, 2016
22:25 Re: feature or a bug with long double (quad-precision) in gcc (6.2.1) Vincent Lefevre
14:29 Re: [libstdc++-v3] lib64 folder is ignored when building x86_64-*-linux-gnu multilib cross toolchain Jonathan Wakely
11:47 [libstdc++-v3] lib64 folder is ignored when building x86_64-*-linux-gnu multilib cross toolchain Dmitry Perov

December 19, 2016
15:31 Re: Compat: Missing things from libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py Paul Smith
10:27 Re: Compat: Missing things from libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py Jonathan Wakely
05:43 Re: Compat: Missing things from libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py Paul Smith

December 18, 2016
23:22 Re: Compat: Missing things from libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py Jonathan Wakely
02:09 Re: Compat: Missing things from libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py Paul Smith

December 16, 2016
18:43 -mlong-double-* used in libgcc/config/t-* files Zdenek Sojka
14:38 Thinking about expanding your consultancy? DavidWhipple
11:03 Re: Using gcc-6.2 with -std=c++03 switch leads to compile errors Jonathan Wakely
11:00 Re: Using gcc-6.2 with -std=c++03 switch leads to compile errors Jonathan Wakely
10:41 Re: Comparison of global addresses not constexpr; is this a GCC bug? Jonathan Wakely
10:04 Using gcc-6.2 with -std=c++03 switch leads to compile errors Edward Diener
07:44 Comparison of global addresses not constexpr; is this a GCC bug? Enis BAYRAMOĞLU

December 15, 2016
10:51 Re: support Jonathan Wakely
07:33 support g arumugam

December 14, 2016
18:51 Re: Adding a new thread model to libstdc++-v3 Silvano Seva
11:44 Re: Adding a new thread model to libstdc++-v3 Jonathan Wakely
11:25 Adding a new thread model to libstdc++-v3 Silvano Seva
11:06 Re: Compat: Missing things from libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py Jonathan Wakely
10:30 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Florian Weimer
10:11 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Andrew Haley
10:05 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Andrew Haley
10:05 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Florian Weimer
10:01 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Segher Boessenkool
09:49 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Andrew Haley
02:17 Re: Why isn't gcc designed to use option boundary only for targets in target_clones attribute? Mingye Wang (Arthur2e5)

December 13, 2016
21:21 Re: Why isn't gcc designed to use option boundary only for targets in target_clones attribute? Evgeny Stupachenko
21:01 Re: Why isn't gcc designed to use option boundary only for targets in target_clones attribute? Victor Rodriguez
19:49 Compat: Missing things from libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py Paul Smith
18:16 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Segher Boessenkool
16:20 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Florian Weimer
16:07 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Jeff Law
16:00 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Florian Weimer
15:56 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Jeff Law
15:51 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Florian Weimer
15:41 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Jeff Law
15:32 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Florian Weimer
09:50 Re: Why isn't gcc designed to use option boundary only for targets in target_clones attribute? Mason
09:48 Re: Using the stack from inline assembly Andrew Haley
07:13 Using the stack from inline assembly Florian Weimer
01:36 Why isn't gcc designed to use option boundary only for targets in target_clones attribute? Mingye Wang (Arthur2e5)

December 12, 2016
21:31 gcc with --disable-nls fedor_qd via gcc-help
18:25 ??????????????????? 6l

December 09, 2016
15:39 Re: Statically linked gcc Bob Wilkinson
13:33 Statically linked gcc Сергей Солнцев

December 08, 2016
15:12 Re: printf() print arguments in reversed order Andrew Haley
15:09 Re: Re: printf() print arguments in reversed order Andrew Makhorin
12:32 Original file path of precompiled header Vasily Romanikhin
12:25 Re: Re: printf() print arguments in reversed order Markus Trippelsdorf
12:17 Re: Re: printf() print arguments in reversed order Jonathan Wakely
11:46 Re: Re: printf() print arguments in reversed order lhmouse
10:01 Re: printf() print arguments in reversed order Jonathan Wakely
09:41 Re: printf() print arguments in reversed order Mason
09:28 Re: feature or a bug with long double (quad-precision) in gcc (6.2.1) Mason
07:13 Re: printf() print arguments in reversed order lhmouse
06:43 printf() print arguments in reversed order topher
01:49 Re: feature or a bug with long double (quad-precision) in gcc (6.2.1) Vladimir Lomov

December 07, 2016
14:41 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Georg-Johann Lay
14:00 Re: Missed optimization wrt. constructor clobbers? Avi Kivity
13:48 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Jakub Jelinek
13:13 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Alexander Monakov
13:06 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Mason
12:58 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Georg-Johann Lay
12:43 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Segher Boessenkool
12:36 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Georg-Johann Lay
12:14 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Segher Boessenkool
11:40 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Georg-Johann Lay
11:02 Re: Missed optimization wrt. constructor clobbers? Avi Kivity

December 06, 2016
22:47 Re: Missed optimization wrt. constructor clobbers? Marc Glisse
15:51 Missed optimization wrt. constructor clobbers? Avi Kivity
11:39 Re: feature or a bug with long double (quad-precision) in gcc (6.2.1) Vincent Lefevre

December 05, 2016
16:40 Re: How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Georg-Johann Lay
16:05 How to avoid constant propagation into functions? Georg-Johann Lay
15:07 Allocation of local variables on stack Ingo Rohloff

December 04, 2016
15:43 Re: Why GCC prefers global size-unaware deallocation function? Ruslan Garipov
14:50 Re: Why GCC prefers global size-unaware deallocation function? Avi Kivity
12:26 Why GCC prefers global size-unaware deallocation function? Ruslan Garipov

December 03, 2016
14:11 feature or a bug with long double (quad-precision) in gcc (6.2.1) Vladimir Lomov

December 02, 2016
16:03 Re: compile template question chenzero
15:16 Re: Re: Re: compile template question lhmouse
15:11 Re: Re: compile template question Jonathan Wakely
14:43 New eFax from 866-313 5835 Amir Martin
14:25 Re: Re: compile template question lhmouse
14:04 Re: compile template question chenzero
13:34 Re: compile template question Jonathan Wakely
13:11 Re: compile template question chenzero
12:54 Re: compile template question Jonathan Wakely

December 01, 2016
17:24 Re: The -Wp,M options behaviour change Jiri Olsa
17:16 Re: The -Wp,M options behaviour change Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
13:15 Re: Stop bootstrap build after stage 1? Segher Boessenkool
12:19 Re: Stop bootstrap build after stage 1? Jonathan Wakely
11:35 Stop bootstrap build after stage 1? Dominik Vogt
11:06 Re: The -Wp,M options behaviour change Jiri Olsa
06:45 Re: Build stage-1 gcc with ubsan Prathamesh Kulkarni
04:52 Re: Build stage-1 gcc with ubsan Markus Trippelsdorf
01:40 Re: The -Wp,M options behaviour change Wangnan (F)


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc