This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated?

From: waltdnes at waltdnes dot org
To: GCC help list <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 23:04:11 -0400
Subject: Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20160928231454.GA21018@waltdnes.org> <8610e4a4-0e60-1633-f245-3f8051473487@redhat.com>

  My apologies to Andrew for replying direct to him.  I didn't realise
that this is one of those lists that mungs replies to not go back to the
list.  Nothing that a few lines of procmail/formail can't cure.  Anyhow,
the further question I had was...

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:21:46AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote

> That sounds fine.  Intel have used the "Atom" trademark to refer to
> Bonnell, Silvermont, and Goldmont processors.  We like to be more
> specific.

  Thanks.  For future reference, what does "-march=atom" do?  Do I get
a "bonnell" build, or generic, or something else?

-- 
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org>

References:
- Is "-march=atom" deprecated?
  - From: waltdnes
- Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]