gcc-help archive
author index for September, 2016

This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Manuel López-Ibáñez

2016-09-04 22:31 Re: -fcode-hoisting in GCC 6.2

Adam Warner

2016-09-01 08:11 Use q modifier for XMM portion of an YMM register?

Alexander Monakov

2016-09-26 14:29 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing

andrealphus

2016-09-02 23:45 torque install ubuntu elision broadwell

Andrew Haley

2016-09-26 12:19 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-26 09:32 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-27 13:10 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-29 09:22 Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated?

Avi Kivity

2016-09-04 12:22 Re: Atomics and lock free

Chris Johns

2016-09-28 00:23 Re: C++ exception handler on gnu arm cortex m4

Daniel Genin

2016-09-08 18:02 ARC Arctangent A4 toolchain

David Brown

2016-09-01 09:38 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?
2016-09-27 12:45 Re: C++ exception handler on gnu arm cortex m4
2016-09-25 21:46 Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-01 19:05 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?
2016-09-26 11:35 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-01 19:33 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?

Dennis Clarke

2016-09-09 09:51 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11
2016-09-08 16:55 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11
2016-09-12 04:23 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11

drwho

2016-09-21 16:34 Re: int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3
2016-09-21 16:10 int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3
2016-09-21 21:31 Re: int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3

Evgenii Shatokhin

2016-09-07 20:03 Creating builtins or using the inliner in a GCC plugin

Florian Weimer

2016-09-17 17:09 Which compiler pass prints a warning?
2016-09-19 16:39 Re: Which compiler pass prints a warning?
2016-09-18 14:29 Re: building old gcc3 for i386-linux on recent x86-linux?
2016-09-01 19:19 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?
2016-09-27 18:32 Re: Optimization question
2016-09-01 09:10 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?
2016-09-03 17:38 Re: torque install ubuntu elision broadwell
2016-09-27 15:20 Re: Optimization question

Gordon Bowring

2016-09-28 22:09 gcov and logical lines of code spanning multiple source lines

Jan Smets

2016-09-29 15:43 volatile struct requires static initialisation with asan in c++11 ?

Jeff Law

2016-09-19 14:47 Re: Which compiler pass prints a warning?

Jeffrey Walton

2016-09-16 11:37 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-18 00:45 -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch))
2016-09-18 11:59 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch))
2016-09-28 19:15 Re: Order of expressions to minimize branch mis-predictions?
2016-09-28 15:09 Order of expressions to minimize branch mis-predictions?
2016-09-20 00:17 Does Solaris 11 support GCC's init_priority?

jfb

2016-09-11 21:39 Re: ezmlm warning

Jonathan Wakely

2016-09-16 09:07 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-27 17:49 Re: Optimization question
2016-09-27 17:10 Re: Optimization question
2016-09-09 09:37 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11
2016-09-20 09:05 Re: Does Solaris 11 support GCC's init_priority?
2016-09-06 09:23 Re: -fcode-hoisting in GCC 6.2
2016-09-09 11:13 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11
2016-09-16 13:37 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-28 10:13 Re: Optimization question

Kalle Olavi Niemitalo

2016-09-01 06:14 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?

Kurt Roeckx

2016-09-03 11:39 Re: Atomics and lock free
2016-09-03 10:30 Atomics and lock free

Mahmood Naderan

2016-09-20 18:47 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 10:55 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 11:05 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 12:13 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 12:40 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-20 10:20 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-21 17:49 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 07:56 illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 09:05 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 12:12 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-20 09:54 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 12:50 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-18 11:02 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch))
2016-09-18 11:23 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch))

Marc BALEMBOY

2016-09-09 11:29 RE: Compiling soft-fp in libgcc
2016-09-01 13:14 Compiling soft-fp in libgcc

Marc Glisse

2016-09-18 09:20 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch))

Markus Klemm

2016-09-27 08:59 C++ exception handler on gnu arm cortex m4

Markus Trippelsdorf

2016-09-21 19:04 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 10:57 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-27 13:23 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-16 12:47 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 11:07 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 09:07 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 08:31 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-16 11:01 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-18 11:05 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch))
2016-09-16 11:09 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)

Martin Sebor

2016-09-18 18:23 Re: Which compiler pass prints a warning?

Mason

2016-09-09 07:22 Re: ARC Arctangent A4 toolchain
2016-09-27 08:04 Re: -fsanitize=shift compile error

Mateusz Tabaka

2016-09-26 23:43 -fsanitize=shift compile error
2016-09-27 15:50 Re: -fsanitize=shift compile error

Matt Godbolt

2016-09-04 21:29 -fcode-hoisting in GCC 6.2
2016-09-06 12:44 Re: -fcode-hoisting in GCC 6.2

Michiel Bacchiani

2016-09-02 02:38 Configuring a cross compile with --with_sysroot
2016-09-02 14:33 Re: Configuring a cross compile with --with_sysroot

Nikolaus Dunn

2016-09-27 17:39 Re: Optimization question

Oleg Endo

2016-09-03 11:10 Re: Atomics and lock free

Rainer Orth

2016-09-20 09:24 Re: Does Solaris 11 support GCC's init_priority?

Richard Earnshaw (lists)

2016-09-20 13:29 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-21 09:48 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-21 16:46 Re: int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3
2016-09-20 10:06 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)
2016-09-27 09:31 Re: C++ exception handler on gnu arm cortex m4
2016-09-21 16:18 Re: int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3
2016-09-20 09:20 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)

Rogerio de Souza Moraes

2016-09-16 15:44 GCC v6.2.0 Testsuit - High number of unexpected failures on RHEL 5.5

Sascha Frick

2016-09-09 09:53 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11
2016-09-08 16:11 Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11
2016-09-09 09:26 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11
2016-09-14 07:51 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11

Segher Boessenkool

2016-09-27 02:32 Re: -fsanitize=shift compile error

Toshi Morita

2016-09-01 20:50 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?
2016-09-01 19:14 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?
2016-09-01 03:10 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?
2016-09-01 18:15 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?
2016-09-01 07:19 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?

Vincent Lefevre

2016-09-27 13:39 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-27 13:09 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-27 13:46 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing
2016-09-27 12:49 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing

waltdnes

2016-09-28 23:15 Is "-march=atom" deprecated?
2016-09-30 03:04 Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated?

yhb

2016-09-30 04:29 GCC 6.2: configure: error: uint64_t or int64_t not found

yoma sophian

2016-09-05 06:36 about kernel configuration CONFIG_CPU_ARM_CORTEX_A15

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc

gcc-help archiveauthor index for September, 2016

gcc-help archive
author index for September, 2016