gcc-help archive
date index for September, 2016

This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2016
04:29 GCC 6.2: configure: error: uint64_t or int64_t not found yhb
03:04 Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated? waltdnes

September 29, 2016
15:43 volatile struct requires static initialisation with asan in c++11 ? Jan Smets
09:22 Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated? Andrew Haley

September 28, 2016
23:15 Is "-march=atom" deprecated? waltdnes
22:09 gcov and logical lines of code spanning multiple source lines Gordon Bowring
19:15 Re: Order of expressions to minimize branch mis-predictions? Jeffrey Walton
15:09 Order of expressions to minimize branch mis-predictions? Jeffrey Walton
10:13 Re: Optimization question Jonathan Wakely
00:23 Re: C++ exception handler on gnu arm cortex m4 Chris Johns

September 27, 2016
18:32 Re: Optimization question Florian Weimer
17:49 Re: Optimization question Jonathan Wakely
17:39 Re: Optimization question Nikolaus Dunn
17:10 Re: Optimization question Jonathan Wakely
15:50 Re: -fsanitize=shift compile error Mateusz Tabaka
15:20 Re: Optimization question Florian Weimer
13:46 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Vincent Lefevre
13:39 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Vincent Lefevre
13:23 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Markus Trippelsdorf
13:10 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Andrew Haley
13:09 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Vincent Lefevre
12:49 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Vincent Lefevre
12:45 Re: C++ exception handler on gnu arm cortex m4 David Brown
09:31 Re: C++ exception handler on gnu arm cortex m4 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
08:59 C++ exception handler on gnu arm cortex m4 Markus Klemm
08:04 Re: -fsanitize=shift compile error Mason
02:32 Re: -fsanitize=shift compile error Segher Boessenkool

September 26, 2016
23:43 -fsanitize=shift compile error Mateusz Tabaka
14:29 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Alexander Monakov
12:19 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Andrew Haley
11:35 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing David Brown
09:32 Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing Andrew Haley

September 25, 2016
21:46 Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing David Brown

September 21, 2016
21:31 Re: int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3 drwho
19:04 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Markus Trippelsdorf
17:49 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
16:46 Re: int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
16:34 Re: int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3 drwho
16:18 Re: int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
16:10 int64_t divide crashing on cortex-m3 drwho
09:48 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Richard Earnshaw (lists)

September 20, 2016
18:47 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
13:29 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Richard Earnshaw (lists)
10:20 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
10:06 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Richard Earnshaw (lists)
09:54 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
09:24 Re: Does Solaris 11 support GCC's init_priority? Rainer Orth
09:20 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Richard Earnshaw (lists)
09:05 Re: Does Solaris 11 support GCC's init_priority? Jonathan Wakely
00:17 Does Solaris 11 support GCC's init_priority? Jeffrey Walton

September 19, 2016
16:39 Re: Which compiler pass prints a warning? Florian Weimer
14:47 Re: Which compiler pass prints a warning? Jeff Law

September 18, 2016
18:23 Re: Which compiler pass prints a warning? Martin Sebor
14:29 Re: building old gcc3 for i386-linux on recent x86-linux? Florian Weimer
11:59 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)) Jeffrey Walton
11:23 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)) Mahmood Naderan
11:05 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)) Markus Trippelsdorf
11:02 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)) Mahmood Naderan
09:20 Re: -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)) Marc Glisse
00:45 -march=x86-64 (was: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch)) Jeffrey Walton

September 17, 2016
17:09 Which compiler pass prints a warning? Florian Weimer

September 16, 2016
15:44 GCC v6.2.0 Testsuit - High number of unexpected failures on RHEL 5.5 Rogerio de Souza Moraes
13:37 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Jonathan Wakely
12:50 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
12:47 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Markus Trippelsdorf
12:40 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
12:13 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
12:12 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
11:37 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Jeffrey Walton
11:09 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Markus Trippelsdorf
11:07 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Markus Trippelsdorf
11:05 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
11:01 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Markus Trippelsdorf
10:57 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Markus Trippelsdorf
10:55 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
09:07 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Markus Trippelsdorf
09:07 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Jonathan Wakely
09:05 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan
08:31 Re: illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Markus Trippelsdorf
07:56 illegal instruction (CPU mismatch) Mahmood Naderan

September 14, 2016
07:51 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Sascha Frick

September 12, 2016
04:23 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Dennis Clarke

September 11, 2016
21:39 Re: ezmlm warning jfb

September 09, 2016
11:29 RE: Compiling soft-fp in libgcc Marc BALEMBOY
11:13 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Jonathan Wakely
09:53 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Sascha Frick
09:51 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Dennis Clarke
09:37 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Jonathan Wakely
09:26 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Sascha Frick
07:22 Re: ARC Arctangent A4 toolchain Mason

September 08, 2016
18:02 ARC Arctangent A4 toolchain Daniel Genin
16:55 Re: Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Dennis Clarke
16:11 Problem with -m64 on Solaris 11 Sascha Frick

September 07, 2016
20:03 Creating builtins or using the inliner in a GCC plugin Evgenii Shatokhin

September 06, 2016
12:44 Re: -fcode-hoisting in GCC 6.2 Matt Godbolt
09:23 Re: -fcode-hoisting in GCC 6.2 Jonathan Wakely

September 05, 2016
06:36 about kernel configuration CONFIG_CPU_ARM_CORTEX_A15 yoma sophian

September 04, 2016
22:31 Re: -fcode-hoisting in GCC 6.2 Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:29 -fcode-hoisting in GCC 6.2 Matt Godbolt
12:22 Re: Atomics and lock free Avi Kivity

September 03, 2016
17:38 Re: torque install ubuntu elision broadwell Florian Weimer
11:39 Re: Atomics and lock free Kurt Roeckx
11:10 Re: Atomics and lock free Oleg Endo
10:30 Atomics and lock free Kurt Roeckx

September 02, 2016
23:45 torque install ubuntu elision broadwell andrealphus
14:33 Re: Configuring a cross compile with --with_sysroot Michiel Bacchiani
02:38 Configuring a cross compile with --with_sysroot Michiel Bacchiani

September 01, 2016
20:50 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Toshi Morita
19:33 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? David Brown
19:19 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Florian Weimer
19:14 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Toshi Morita
19:05 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? David Brown
18:15 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Toshi Morita
13:14 Compiling soft-fp in libgcc Marc BALEMBOY
09:38 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? David Brown
09:10 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Florian Weimer
08:11 Use q modifier for XMM portion of an YMM register? Adam Warner
07:19 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Toshi Morita
06:14 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
03:10 Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Toshi Morita


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc