This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Porting gcc without porting Binutils?
- From: Victor Rodriguez <vm dot rod25 at gmail dot com>
- To: htio2 <wenbin dot leong at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:36:04 -0500
- Subject: Re: Porting gcc without porting Binutils?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1444317733135-1192659 dot post at n5 dot nabble dot com>
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:22 AM, htio2 <wenbin.leong@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am new to porting gcc, just want to ask, if I only want gcc to generate
> assembly language for each files can I skip porting Binutils ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/Porting-gcc-without-porting-Binutils-tp1192659.html
> Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
What do you mean with porting ?
gcc 4 to gcc 5 ?
Regards