This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Atomic floats on x86_64


(This is for Linux x86_64 on 4.9.1)

Is it a bug that I can atomically store a float using __atomic_store,
but not __atomic_store_n?  I'd really like to be able to do it without
the extra layer of indirection and the extra requirement of a temp
variable that I don't need.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]