This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Function Parameters vs. Prologue (fastcall + O1 + -fschedule-insns2)


2013/6/19 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>:
> And that ought to generate the best results, so it seems that everything might be OK.

Yes, that options allowed me to generate the best results.

How the gcc classifies the instructions priorities (latency and
throughout)? In what source file?

Geyslan GregÃrio Bem
hackingbits.com
@geyslangb
br.linkedin.com/in/geyslan


2013/6/19 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Geyslan GregÃrio Bem
> <geyslan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you still see it as a missed-optimization bug, tell me that I'll report it.
>
> I may be misreading, but it seems that you got the best results using
> -mtune=native -fschedule-insns-2 -O1, or -mtune=native -O3.  And that
> ought to generate the best results, so it seems that everything might
> be OK.
>
> Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]