This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Markus Elfring <Markus dot Elfring at web dot de>
- Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:50:02 +0000
- Subject: Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- References: <51114C3A dot 3030806 at web dot de> <CAH6eHdTtokohy3w2QLxtq+psB-FL0ULPZV5dm_wQm5iYPwhMyw at mail dot gmail dot com> <514F347F dot 1010600 at web dot de> <CAH6eHdTiTrSWKV78TNGK9Yj9Ln7W8nHhnRbNeLu1VNTL+kBqRg at mail dot gmail dot com> <514F459A dot 2060405 at web dot de> <CAH6eHdQ2BqcJ-VVGQ7xDy9p=ANVOZTGE965a3a6WywQZ0eA0KQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <514F4968 dot 6070507 at web dot de>
On 24 March 2013 18:43, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> *** Also, the placement of the -l option is significant. ***
>
> I do still not interpret this wording from the documentation in the way that
> link options must be passed as last parameters or behind a source file list.
You are welcome to interpret it however you like, but why not just
test what I said instead of arguing?