gcc-help archive
date index for March, 2013

This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2013
08:36 Google Groups: You've been added to jordanads2029 Jordan Ads (Google Groups)
03:22 Re: extended asm and register clobbers Ian Lance Taylor
01:49 Re: extended asm and register clobbers dw

March 30, 2013
21:04 extended asm and register clobbers dw
06:10 RE: glibc will not compile with -flto John Frankish
04:08 Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace niXman

March 29, 2013
18:37 Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies Ian Lance Taylor
17:47 RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
17:29 Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies Chung-Ju Wu
16:12 Re: GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc Alexpux
15:39 Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies Ian Lance Taylor
15:36 Re: Effects of Link Time Optimizations in Illegal Libraries Ian Lance Taylor
14:57 Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies Miguel Guedes
14:02 Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies Ian Lance Taylor
13:40 Re: glibc will not compile with -flto Ian Lance Taylor
13:19 Broken SO due to dropped dependencies Miguel Guedes
13:16 Re: GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc Ian Lance Taylor
13:12 Re: Default include directories Miguel Guedes
10:36 glibc will not compile with -flto John Frankish
09:14 GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc Алексей Павлов
07:46 Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace Markus Trippelsdorf
06:24 Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace niXman
06:12 Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace David Abdurachmanov
06:01 Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace niXman
03:45 Effects of Link Time Optimizations in Illegal Libraries Jeffrey Walton

March 28, 2013
23:35 Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Jan Hubicka
19:23 LTO_tags out of range: Range is 0 to 365, value is 1432 niXman
17:17 Re: Default include directories Ian Lance Taylor
16:04 Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc Jonathan Wakely
15:39 Default include directories Miguel Guedes
11:41 Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc ikrabbe . ask
11:06 Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc nagarjun
10:58 Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc Jonathan Wakely
10:56 Re: :: not recognized in 4.1.1 Jonathan Wakely
10:17 what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc nagarjun
09:18 Re: :: not recognized in 4.1.1 Jonathan Wakely
09:16 :: not recognized in 4.1.1 chinhow
09:08 Re: libstdc++ concept checking Jonathan Wakely
03:16 atoimic type variants ishare
02:37 libstdc++ concept checking NightStrike
01:09 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Raymond Jennings
00:50 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Ian Lance Taylor
00:45 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Raymond Jennings

March 27, 2013
22:43 Re: GCC 4.8 build Kalai Rajah N
21:58 Re: GCC 4.8 build Ian Lance Taylor
20:42 Re: GCC 4.8 build Kalai Rajah N
19:41 Re: GCC 4.8 build Ian Lance Taylor
18:46 Re: GCC 4.8 build Kalai Rajah N
18:41 Re: GCC 4.8 build Ian Lance Taylor
18:32 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Ian Lance Taylor
18:29 Re: GCC 4.8 build Kalai Rajah N
18:21 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Raymond Jennings
18:15 Re: GCC 4.8 build Ian Lance Taylor
17:57 Re: GCC 4.8 build Kalai Rajah N
17:41 Re: GCC 4.8 build Ian Lance Taylor
17:32 Re: GCC 4.8 build Kalai Rajah N
13:18 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Ian Lance Taylor
10:02 Re: Correct use of "-flto" Jonathan Wakely
07:23 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Raymond Jennings
04:01 RE: Correct use of "-flto" John Frankish
01:25 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Raymond Jennings

March 26, 2013
17:57 Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH Martin Corino
17:53 Re: GCC 4.8 build Kalai Rajah N
17:27 Re: GCC 4.8 build Jonathan Wakely
17:17 GCC 4.8 build Kalai Rajah N
16:06 Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH Tobias Burnus
15:23 Re: 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues Dennis Clarke
14:49 Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH Martin Corino
14:22 Re: Correct use of "-flto" Ian Lance Taylor
14:20 Re: acceptable versions of cloog? Ian Lance Taylor
11:54 Correct use of "-flto" John Frankish
11:24 Re: Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) gcc_mailinglist
11:13 Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Jan Hubicka
06:24 Re: about inline Chung-Ju Wu
05:25 acceptable versions of cloog? Raymond Jennings
04:21 lto-wrapper failure in GCC 4.8.0 Matt Godbolt
03:29 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues Steven Christensen
00:43 Re: about inline ishare

March 25, 2013
22:09 DIGIT EMBROIDERY DIGIT EMBROIDERY
21:56 Re: Another question re asm constraints Ian Lance Taylor
21:51 Another question re asm constraints dw
17:04 Re: SV: Help installing GCC compiler Tim Prince
16:22 Re: Help installing GCC compiler Jonathan Wakely
16:01 SV: Help installing GCC compiler Köplin Nina
15:34 Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Markus Trippelsdorf
15:32 Re: Help installing GCC compiler Ian Lance Taylor
15:10 Help installing GCC compiler Köplin Nina
14:18 Re: about inline Chung-Ju Wu
14:17 Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Richard Biener
13:25 Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Markus Trippelsdorf
13:13 Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Markus Trippelsdorf
13:11 Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Richard Biener
13:07 Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Andi Kleen
12:57 Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) Markus Trippelsdorf
07:07 Re: gcc 4.8.0 compile with lto Markus Trippelsdorf
06:06 Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction dw
03:55 Re: 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both. Dennis Clarke
03:29 Re: about inline ishare
03:27 Re: 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both. Ian Lance Taylor
03:22 Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction Ian Lance Taylor
02:38 Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction dw
00:16 paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction dw

March 24, 2013
19:53 gcc 4.8.0 compile with lto gcc_mailinglist
19:30 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring
19:08 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Jonathan Wakely
19:00 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring
18:50 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Jonathan Wakely
18:44 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring
18:36 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Jonathan Wakely
18:34 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Jonathan Wakely
18:27 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring
18:13 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring
17:41 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Jonathan Wakely
17:41 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Jonathan Wakely
17:14 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring
16:40 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring
15:02 Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Jonathan Wakely
12:52 Symbol visibility and namespace DÃniel Varga
12:22 Re: about inline Oleg Endo
07:03 Re: about inline Chung-Ju Wu
06:44 gcc 4.8.0 bootstrap fails on darwin with linker assertion Dara Hazeghi
03:47 about inline ishare

March 23, 2013
19:22 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz Dennis Clarke
17:12 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both. Dennis Clarke
14:55 Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 Jonathan Wakely
14:52 Re: std::wstring_convert Jonathan Wakely
04:53 Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP
02:35 std::wstring_convert Mihai Moldovan
00:47 Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 Ian Lance Taylor
00:26 gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP

March 22, 2013
23:37 Re: -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin Hei Chan
23:26 Re: -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin Hei Chan
17:40 Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2 Ellis N. Thomas
15:16 Re: GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian) phi gcc
13:52 Re: GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian) Ian Lance Taylor
13:35 GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian) phi gcc
11:03 Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi Kai Ruottu
10:52 Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi Kai Ruottu
03:36 Re: GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support Bharath Ramesh

March 21, 2013
20:45 Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success Dennis Clarke
20:35 Re: GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support Tim Prince
20:24 GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support Bharath Ramesh
20:16 Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success Dennis Clarke
19:31 Re: char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1 Ángel González
18:18 Re: char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1 Jonathan Wakely
18:14 Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2 Jonathan Wakely
18:08 Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success Jonathan Wakely
17:56 Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2 Tim Prince
16:55 Error in make building gcc-4.7.2 Ellis N. Thomas
16:08 char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1 Alexander Striffeler
15:25 RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success Dennis Clarke
14:28 gprof: derivation of the uncertainty/error result David Flater
10:04 Re: building gcc on slackware64 14 Jonathan Wakely
06:15 4.8.0 RC odd messages in stage 1 : objdump: command not found Dennis Clarke
03:52 Re: gcc 4.7.2 guality faults in slackware14 but not 13 AMD64 Ian Lance Taylor
02:44 Re: GCC 4.8.0 released ? Dennis Clarke
01:41 building gcc on slackware64 14 B.S.J.W. Stephenson
01:00 Re: GCC 4.8.0 released ? Jonathan Wakely

March 20, 2013
23:49 GCC 4.8.0 released ? Dennis Clarke
17:55 Regarding the alignment limit of the alignas specifier Emil 'Skeen' Madsen
13:28 Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L" Andrew Chi
12:48 Re: Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7 Tim Prince
09:41 Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend Jens Mehler
06:57 Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7 AlexVi
04:30 Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L" Chung-Ju Wu
04:28 -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin Hei Chan
04:26 Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L" Ian Lance Taylor
04:08 Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend Chung-Ju Wu

March 19, 2013
23:42 Re: -flto with -g Jonathan Wakely
23:40 -flto with -g Hei Chan
20:04 Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory. Jonathan Wakely
20:02 parsing precedence of long integer literal "L" Andrew Chi
20:00 Gold dust/Bar Jacob Mensah
15:23 Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory. zero modulo
14:01 Invoice #0175636 Hung_Irwin
12:09 Re: internel of new operator Philip Herron
10:29 internel of new operator ishare

March 18, 2013
13:33 Bootstrapping new architectures with C++ Sam Thursfield
13:10 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Mark Hounschell
13:02 g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
11:02 Extending gcc-4.5 Hayder
09:13 Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory. Andrew Haley
08:50 RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
06:07 `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory. zero modulo
06:04 Re: Getting GCC to target Windows RT NightStrike
02:08 Re: Getting GCC to target Windows RT Jeffrey Walton

March 17, 2013
20:12 Re: Minimum debug options? Jeffrey Walton
19:05 Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend Jens Mehler
13:14 Re: what does this mean? Jonathan Wakely
13:04 Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend Jens Mehler
12:50 Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend Chung-Ju Wu
11:52 Getting GCC to target Windows RT Nathan K. Ladwig (Netham45)
10:12 Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend Jens Mehler
08:56 programme header ishare
08:28 Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6 Kai Ruottu
06:51 what does this mean? ishare
03:23 RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
02:59 RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)

March 16, 2013
20:52 Re: Minimum debug options? Ian Lance Taylor
17:46 Re: Minimum debug options? Jonathan Wakely
08:15 Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc Jens Mehler
06:48 Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc Chung-Ju Wu
06:28 Re: Automatic accessor function inlining Chung-Ju Wu
05:52 Minimum debug options? Raymond Jennings

March 15, 2013
18:01 Re: Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking Florian Weimer
13:27 Re: Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking Ian Lance Taylor
10:29 Re: Automatic accessor function inlining Tobias Burnus
10:17 Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking Cosimo Caproni
10:06 Automatic accessor function inlining LRN

March 14, 2013
17:07 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Tim Prince
16:02 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Tobias Burnus
14:41 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Tobias Burnus
14:28 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Mark Hounschell
14:03 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Tim Prince
13:40 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Mark Hounschell
13:39 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Tim Prince
12:30 Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Tobias Burnus
12:02 gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments Mark Hounschell

March 13, 2013
18:02 Re: Application receives SIGILL OBD
17:04 Re: Application receives SIGILL Andrew Haley
15:14 Re: Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc Florian Weimer
15:04 Re: Why does not RVO work in this case? Jonathan Wakely
13:43 Re: httpd startup error Ian Lance Taylor
13:27 httpd startup error andyroo
11:50 Re: Application receives SIGILL Andrew Haley
10:33 Application receives SIGILL OBD
10:11 Why does not RVO work in this case? Henrik Mannerström
09:03 UPGRADE YOUR EMAIL QUOTA Ing . Štefan Hajdu
00:30 Re: Function with two or more entry point sztfg

March 12, 2013
22:05 Order John Bless
21:56 Re: Function with two or more entry point sztfg
21:50 Order John Bless
21:29 Order John Bless
21:22 Order John Bless
21:18 Re: Function with two or more entry point Ángel González
21:16 Re: Function with two or more entry point James Bowman
20:37 Re: Function with two or more entry point Ian Lance Taylor
20:17 Function with two or more entry point sztfg
08:56 Re: Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc Jonathan Wakely
06:02 Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc Tim Schumacher
00:19 Re: need help on 4.4.6 Michael Eager

March 11, 2013
19:45 Dear Supplier Ronald Bradford
16:57 RE: need help on 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
16:14 Narodowy Program Walki z Nieuczciwymi PÅatnikami w Transporcie Program Walki z Nieuczciwymi P
12:51 Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C Andreas Tobler
12:35 Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C Pedro Alves
08:10 RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling Heiko.Papenfuss
08:06 RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling Heiko.Papenfuss
01:24 Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc Jens Mehler

March 10, 2013
17:30 Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc Jens Mehler
17:05 Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc Ian Lance Taylor
16:56 Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc Jens Mehler
16:52 Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc Ian Lance Taylor
13:57 Bad Register Number for libgcc Jens Mehler

March 09, 2013
13:21 Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk xunxun
12:29 Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk niXman
01:37 Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C Ian Lance Taylor
00:56 Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C Pedro Alves

March 08, 2013
22:18 Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C Ian Lance Taylor
20:34 RE: help building 4.7.1 Koenig, Mark (ISS SCI - Plano,
20:28 Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C Pedro Alves
19:36 Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C Ian Lance Taylor
19:25 Re: help building 4.7.1 Dennis Clarke
19:24 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C Pedro Alves
19:15 Re: help building 4.7.1 Jonathan Wakely
19:12 help building 4.7.1 Koenig, Mark (ISS SCI - Plano,
16:51 Re: need help on 4.4.6 Michael Eager
14:06 Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk xunxun
09:39 Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk niXman
09:13 Re: g++ member function .at() for arrays Florian Weimer
06:11 Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk niXman
02:59 RE: need help on 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
01:30 Re: need help on 4.4.6 Michael Eager

March 07, 2013
22:18 need help on 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
22:12 Aw: Re: Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES gcc_mailinglist
21:12 Re: Aw: Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Kai Ruottu
20:23 Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jonathan Wakely
20:20 Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Ian Lance Taylor
20:13 Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Kai Ruottu
19:41 compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES gcc_mailinglist
19:40 compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Daniel Albers
14:38 RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
14:37 Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling Jonathan Wakely
14:24 Re: cross compiling stage 1 libgcc fails Andrew Haley
13:59 Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling Michael Powell
13:56 RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling Heiko.Papenfuss
09:50 Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6 Kai Ruottu
09:45 Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling Jonathan Wakely
09:24 Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling Heiko.Papenfuss
09:08 issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
08:56 Re: Separate CFLAGS for libgcc? Chung-Ju Wu
08:43 LTO error in gcc-trunk niXman
07:13 Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi Bela Markus
03:14 RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
01:07 Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected Tim Prince
00:25 Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected Tim Prince

March 06, 2013
21:36 Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task Jonathan Wakely
21:21 Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task NightStrike
21:13 Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected Michele Martone
20:38 Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi Bela Markus
20:12 Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task Jonathan Wakely
20:09 Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected Michele Martone
18:29 Re: cross compiling stage 1 libgcc fails c523716
18:18 Re: cross compiling stage 1 libgcc fails Andrew Haley
18:10 cross compiling stage 1 libgcc fails c522473
17:16 Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected Tim Prince
17:08 Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected Tim Prince
16:53 Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected Alexander Monakov
16:38 "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected Michele Martone
10:54 Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6 Kai Ruottu
10:22 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC Andrew Haley
09:49 RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)
09:42 Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi Bela Markus
09:30 Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi Jonathan Wakely
09:29 Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6 Jonathan Wakely
05:10 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi Bela Markus
05:04 issues with gcc 4.4.6 GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)

March 05, 2013
23:30 Using thread sanitizer Daniel B Mosesson
21:29 Re: Setting up a autoconf configure system Ian Lance Taylor
21:28 Re: Unable to use caret diagnostics Daniel B Mosesson
20:47 Re: Warnings with -Og - gcc 4.8 Jeffrey Walton
20:39 Re: Warnings with -Og - gcc 4.8 Jeff Law
20:23 Re: Warnings with -Og - gcc 4.8 Lars Gullik Bjønnes
20:20 Re: Warnings with -Og - gcc 4.8 Jeff Law
19:57 Re: Unable to use caret diagnostics Paul Smith
19:56 Re: Unable to use caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
19:48 Re: Unable to use caret diagnostics Daniel B Mosesson
19:35 Re: Unable to use caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
19:06 Re: Unable to use caret diagnostics Daniel B Mosesson
19:05 Re: Warnings with -Og - gcc 4.8 Lars Gullik Bjønnes
19:00 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC Jeffrey Walton
18:46 Re: Warnings with -Og - gcc 4.8 Jeffrey Walton
18:41 Warnings with -Og - gcc 4.8 Lars Gullik BjÃnnes
18:39 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC Jeffrey Walton
14:51 Re: Unable to use caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
14:35 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC Ian Lance Taylor
13:33 Unable to use caret diagnostics Daniel B Mosesson
12:38 RE: C++ binary compatibility between different versions of gcc Heiko.Papenfuss
12:21 Re: Is -fprofile-generate safe for parallel make? Michael Veksler
11:26 Re: C++ binary compatibility between different versions of gcc Jonathan Wakely
10:39 RE: C++ binary compatibility between different versions of gcc Heiko.Papenfuss
10:19 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC David Brown
10:14 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC Tobias Burnus
09:58 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC David Paterson
09:46 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC Georg-Johann Lay
09:40 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC Jonathan Wakely
09:28 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC David Paterson
06:26 RE: no warning even with -Wcast-align in windows/hp-ux Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath
03:53 RE: no warning even with -Wcast-align in windows/hp-ux Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath
00:09 Setting up a autoconf configure system Michael Powell

March 04, 2013
23:46 Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC Jonathan Wakely
23:40 Question on volatile functions and GCC Jeffrey Walton
18:01 Re: C++ binary compatibility between different versions of gcc Jonathan Wakely
16:48 C++ binary compatibility between different versions of gcc Heiko.Papenfuss
16:12 Separate CFLAGS for libgcc? Fanael Linithien
15:14 Re: cross compiling gcc for i686 target vijay nag
10:23 no warning even with -Wcast-align in windows/hp-ux Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath
05:41 Re: what does this do ? Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
03:07 what does this do ? ishare
00:21 Re: C++0x and C++11 status Miles Bader

March 03, 2013
23:24 Re: C++0x and C++11 status Jonathan Wakely
22:35 C++0x and C++11 status Michael Powell
22:25 Order Inquiry Vincent Crickets
13:25 Re: __attribute__((regparm(3))) Chung-Ju Wu
12:15 __attribute__((regparm(3))) horse

March 02, 2013
17:16 Re: Need help: building crosstool-ng for gcc 4.7 Jonathan Wakely
13:29 Need help: building crosstool-ng for gcc 4.7 Michael Powell
07:45 Re: cross compiling gcc for i686 target vijay nag

March 01, 2013
20:01 Re: cross compiling gcc for i686 target Tim Prince
19:29 Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task Jonathan Wakely
18:28 Re: cross compiling gcc for i686 target Ian Lance Taylor
17:39 Fwd: cross compiling gcc for i686 target vijay nag
12:53 Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task NightStrike
10:45 Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task Jonathan Wakely
10:35 Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task Jonathan Wakely
06:22 c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task NightStrike


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc