This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
March 31, 2013
08:36 | Google Groups: You've been added to jordanads2029 | Jordan Ads (Google Groups) |
03:22 | Re: extended asm and register clobbers | Ian Lance Taylor |
01:49 | Re: extended asm and register clobbers | dw |
March 30, 2013
21:04 | extended asm and register clobbers | dw |
06:10 | RE: glibc will not compile with -flto | John Frankish |
04:08 | Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace | niXman |
March 29, 2013
March 28, 2013
March 27, 2013
22:43 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Kalai Rajah N |
21:58 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Ian Lance Taylor |
20:42 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Kalai Rajah N |
19:41 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:46 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Kalai Rajah N |
18:41 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:32 | Re: acceptable versions of cloog? | Ian Lance Taylor |
18:29 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Kalai Rajah N |
18:21 | Re: acceptable versions of cloog? | Raymond Jennings |
18:15 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:57 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Kalai Rajah N |
17:41 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:32 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Kalai Rajah N |
13:18 | Re: acceptable versions of cloog? | Ian Lance Taylor |
10:02 | Re: Correct use of "-flto" | Jonathan Wakely |
07:23 | Re: acceptable versions of cloog? | Raymond Jennings |
04:01 | RE: Correct use of "-flto" | John Frankish |
01:25 | Re: acceptable versions of cloog? | Raymond Jennings |
March 26, 2013
17:57 | Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH | Martin Corino |
17:53 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Kalai Rajah N |
17:27 | Re: GCC 4.8 build | Jonathan Wakely |
17:17 | GCC 4.8 build | Kalai Rajah N |
16:06 | Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH | Tobias Burnus |
15:23 | Re: 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues | Dennis Clarke |
14:49 | Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH | Martin Corino |
14:22 | Re: Correct use of "-flto" | Ian Lance Taylor |
14:20 | Re: acceptable versions of cloog? | Ian Lance Taylor |
11:54 | Correct use of "-flto" | John Frankish |
11:24 | Re: Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) | gcc_mailinglist |
11:13 | Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO) | Jan Hubicka |
06:24 | Re: about inline | Chung-Ju Wu |
05:25 | acceptable versions of cloog? | Raymond Jennings |
04:21 | lto-wrapper failure in GCC 4.8.0 | Matt Godbolt |
03:29 | 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues | Steven Christensen |
00:43 | Re: about inline | ishare |
March 25, 2013
March 24, 2013
March 23, 2013
19:22 | /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz | Dennis Clarke |
17:12 | 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both. | Dennis Clarke |
14:55 | Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 | Jonathan Wakely |
14:52 | Re: std::wstring_convert | Jonathan Wakely |
04:53 | Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 | C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP |
02:35 | std::wstring_convert | Mihai Moldovan |
00:47 | Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 | Ian Lance Taylor |
00:26 | gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11 | C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP |
March 22, 2013
23:37 | Re: -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin | Hei Chan |
23:26 | Re: -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin | Hei Chan |
17:40 | Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2 | Ellis N. Thomas |
15:16 | Re: GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian) | phi gcc |
13:52 | Re: GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian) | Ian Lance Taylor |
13:35 | GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian) | phi gcc |
11:03 | Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi | Kai Ruottu |
10:52 | Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi | Kai Ruottu |
03:36 | Re: GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support | Bharath Ramesh |
March 21, 2013
March 20, 2013
23:49 | GCC 4.8.0 released ? | Dennis Clarke |
17:55 | Regarding the alignment limit of the alignas specifier | Emil 'Skeen' Madsen |
13:28 | Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L" | Andrew Chi |
12:48 | Re: Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7 | Tim Prince |
09:41 | Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend | Jens Mehler |
06:57 | Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7 | AlexVi |
04:30 | Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L" | Chung-Ju Wu |
04:28 | -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin | Hei Chan |
04:26 | Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L" | Ian Lance Taylor |
04:08 | Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend | Chung-Ju Wu |
March 19, 2013
23:42 | Re: -flto with -g | Jonathan Wakely |
23:40 | -flto with -g | Hei Chan |
20:04 | Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory. | Jonathan Wakely |
20:02 | parsing precedence of long integer literal "L" | Andrew Chi |
20:00 | Gold dust/Bar | Jacob Mensah |
15:23 | Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory. | zero modulo |
14:01 | Invoice #0175636 | Hung_Irwin |
12:09 | Re: internel of new operator | Philip Herron |
10:29 | internel of new operator | ishare |
March 18, 2013
13:33 | Bootstrapping new architectures with C++ | Sam Thursfield |
13:10 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Mark Hounschell |
13:02 | g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6 | GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV) |
11:02 | Extending gcc-4.5 | Hayder |
09:13 | Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory. | Andrew Haley |
08:50 | RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 | GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV) |
06:07 | `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory. | zero modulo |
06:04 | Re: Getting GCC to target Windows RT | NightStrike |
02:08 | Re: Getting GCC to target Windows RT | Jeffrey Walton |
March 17, 2013
20:12 | Re: Minimum debug options? | Jeffrey Walton |
19:05 | Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend | Jens Mehler |
13:14 | Re: what does this mean? | Jonathan Wakely |
13:04 | Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend | Jens Mehler |
12:50 | Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend | Chung-Ju Wu |
11:52 | Getting GCC to target Windows RT | Nathan K. Ladwig (Netham45) |
10:12 | Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend | Jens Mehler |
08:56 | programme header | ishare |
08:28 | Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6 | Kai Ruottu |
06:51 | what does this mean? | ishare |
03:23 | RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 | GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV) |
02:59 | RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6 | GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV) |
March 16, 2013
20:52 | Re: Minimum debug options? | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:46 | Re: Minimum debug options? | Jonathan Wakely |
08:15 | Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc | Jens Mehler |
06:48 | Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc | Chung-Ju Wu |
06:28 | Re: Automatic accessor function inlining | Chung-Ju Wu |
05:52 | Minimum debug options? | Raymond Jennings |
March 15, 2013
18:01 | Re: Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking | Florian Weimer |
13:27 | Re: Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking | Ian Lance Taylor |
10:29 | Re: Automatic accessor function inlining | Tobias Burnus |
10:17 | Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking | Cosimo Caproni |
10:06 | Automatic accessor function inlining | LRN |
March 14, 2013
17:07 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Tim Prince |
16:02 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Tobias Burnus |
14:41 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Tobias Burnus |
14:28 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Mark Hounschell |
14:03 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Tim Prince |
13:40 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Mark Hounschell |
13:39 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Tim Prince |
12:30 | Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Tobias Burnus |
12:02 | gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments | Mark Hounschell |
March 13, 2013
18:02 | Re: Application receives SIGILL | OBD |
17:04 | Re: Application receives SIGILL | Andrew Haley |
15:14 | Re: Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc | Florian Weimer |
15:04 | Re: Why does not RVO work in this case? | Jonathan Wakely |
13:43 | Re: httpd startup error | Ian Lance Taylor |
13:27 | httpd startup error | andyroo |
11:50 | Re: Application receives SIGILL | Andrew Haley |
10:33 | Application receives SIGILL | OBD |
10:11 | Why does not RVO work in this case? | Henrik Mannerström |
09:03 | UPGRADE YOUR EMAIL QUOTA | Ing . Štefan Hajdu |
00:30 | Re: Function with two or more entry point | sztfg |
March 12, 2013
22:05 | Order | John Bless |
21:56 | Re: Function with two or more entry point | sztfg |
21:50 | Order | John Bless |
21:29 | Order | John Bless |
21:22 | Order | John Bless |
21:18 | Re: Function with two or more entry point | Ángel González |
21:16 | Re: Function with two or more entry point | James Bowman |
20:37 | Re: Function with two or more entry point | Ian Lance Taylor |
20:17 | Function with two or more entry point | sztfg |
08:56 | Re: Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc | Jonathan Wakely |
06:02 | Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc | Tim Schumacher |
00:19 | Re: need help on 4.4.6 | Michael Eager |
March 11, 2013
19:45 | Dear Supplier | Ronald Bradford |
16:57 | RE: need help on 4.4.6 | GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV) |
16:14 | Narodowy Program Walki z Nieuczciwymi PÅatnikami w Transporcie | Program Walki z Nieuczciwymi P |
12:51 | Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C | Andreas Tobler |
12:35 | Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C | Pedro Alves |
08:10 | RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling | Heiko.Papenfuss |
08:06 | RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling | Heiko.Papenfuss |
01:24 | Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc | Jens Mehler |
March 10, 2013
17:30 | Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc | Jens Mehler |
17:05 | Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc | Ian Lance Taylor |
16:56 | Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc | Jens Mehler |
16:52 | Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc | Ian Lance Taylor |
13:57 | Bad Register Number for libgcc | Jens Mehler |
March 09, 2013
13:21 | Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk | xunxun |
12:29 | Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk | niXman |
01:37 | Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C | Ian Lance Taylor |
00:56 | Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C | Pedro Alves |
March 08, 2013
22:18 | Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C | Ian Lance Taylor |
20:34 | RE: help building 4.7.1 | Koenig, Mark (ISS SCI - Plano, |
20:28 | Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C | Pedro Alves |
19:36 | Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C | Ian Lance Taylor |
19:25 | Re: help building 4.7.1 | Dennis Clarke |
19:24 | 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C | Pedro Alves |
19:15 | Re: help building 4.7.1 | Jonathan Wakely |
19:12 | help building 4.7.1 | Koenig, Mark (ISS SCI - Plano, |
16:51 | Re: need help on 4.4.6 | Michael Eager |
14:06 | Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk | xunxun |
09:39 | Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk | niXman |
09:13 | Re: g++ member function .at() for arrays | Florian Weimer |
06:11 | Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk | niXman |
02:59 | RE: need help on 4.4.6 | GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV) |
01:30 | Re: need help on 4.4.6 | Michael Eager |
March 07, 2013
March 06, 2013
March 05, 2013
March 04, 2013
23:46 | Re: Question on volatile functions and GCC | Jonathan Wakely |
23:40 | Question on volatile functions and GCC | Jeffrey Walton |
18:01 | Re: C++ binary compatibility between different versions of gcc | Jonathan Wakely |
16:48 | C++ binary compatibility between different versions of gcc | Heiko.Papenfuss |
16:12 | Separate CFLAGS for libgcc? | Fanael Linithien |
15:14 | Re: cross compiling gcc for i686 target | vijay nag |
10:23 | no warning even with -Wcast-align in windows/hp-ux | Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganath |
05:41 | Re: what does this do ? | Kalle Olavi Niemitalo |
03:07 | what does this do ? | ishare |
00:21 | Re: C++0x and C++11 status | Miles Bader |
March 03, 2013
23:24 | Re: C++0x and C++11 status | Jonathan Wakely |
22:35 | C++0x and C++11 status | Michael Powell |
22:25 | Order Inquiry | Vincent Crickets |
13:25 | Re: __attribute__((regparm(3))) | Chung-Ju Wu |
12:15 | __attribute__((regparm(3))) | horse |
March 02, 2013
17:16 | Re: Need help: building crosstool-ng for gcc 4.7 | Jonathan Wakely |
13:29 | Need help: building crosstool-ng for gcc 4.7 | Michael Powell |
07:45 | Re: cross compiling gcc for i686 target | vijay nag |
March 01, 2013
20:01 | Re: cross compiling gcc for i686 target | Tim Prince |
19:29 | Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task | Jonathan Wakely |
18:28 | Re: cross compiling gcc for i686 target | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:39 | Fwd: cross compiling gcc for i686 target | vijay nag |
12:53 | Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task | NightStrike |
10:45 | Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task | Jonathan Wakely |
10:35 | Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task | Jonathan Wakely |
06:22 | c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task | NightStrike |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]