This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base

From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon at iki dot fi>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:44:20 +0300
Subject: Re: empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
References: <87396699c3.fsf@Niukka.kon.iki.fi> <CAH6eHdSQ9TLb_R40QiKAXUbhULANAZhwcg5zx_God0_cqaTZUw@mail.gmail.com>

Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> writes:

> If you have at least two members, one or more of which might be empty,
> then store them in a std::tuple to automatically use the EBO if
> possible.

Thank you for this advice.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
  - From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
- Re: empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]