This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: typo in GCC manual

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: ali hagigat <hagigatali at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:36:23 +0000
Subject: Re: typo in GCC manual
References: <CAKKWdtevCmcyM8YYW9i3kxUm7Y5AhWX3NJAMbUG6+ktb8Nd7Yw@mail.gmail.com>

On 8 January 2012 12:24, ali hagigat wrote:
> GCC manual, version 4.5.0, page 147:
>
> 3.15 Specifying subprocesses and the switches to pass to
> them
> *[spec_name ]:
> If this results in an empty string then the
> ?(Or, if the spec did not exist, then nothing will happened.)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> I apologize if it was reported before but "nothing will happened"
> seems incorrect in English!

Indeed.  It's already fixed on trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Spec-Files.html#Spec-Files

References:
- typo in GCC manual
  - From: ali hagigat

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]