This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

FAIL in movm pattern


Hi,

When is it safe to generate a FAIL in the define_expand of a mov pattern?
Is it enough to test !can_create_pseudo_p() before a FAIL ?

If no such test is performed, some mov insns can be omitted (ex:
expand_call/store_one_arg), without any error message or warning and
it can be difficult to debug it.
Is it a desirable behavior?

Thanks,
Aurélien


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]