This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
September 30, 2011
| 20:31 | Re: Old gcc method parameter error | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 20:11 | Re: Fastest minimum-width integer types and limits macros | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 19:30 | Re: Fastest minimum-width integer types and limits macros | Gunther Nikl |
| 19:20 | Re: Old gcc method parameter error | Gunther Nikl |
| 15:16 | Re: Run with 2 different DSO versions | Vladimir Simonov |
| 08:34 | Re: gcc 4.6.1 for arm-eabi wants to use the system's as instead of arm-eabi-as | Andrew Haley |
| 07:26 | Re: weird problem with c++ libraries and symbols | Ottavio Campana |
| 07:09 | Re: Fastest minimum-width integer types and limits macros | David Brown |
| 06:20 | Re: Fastest minimum-width integer types and limits macros | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 06:06 | Re: How to get the full list of GCC builtins? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 06:05 | Re: Fastest minimum-width integer types and limits macros | Gunther Nikl |
| 05:01 | How to get the full list of GCC builtins? | zhang qingshan |
September 29, 2011
September 28, 2011
| 15:00 | Re: how to detect that the vector extension is available | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 14:36 | Re: how to detect that the vector extension is available | Vincent Torri |
| 13:49 | Re: how to detect that the vector extension is available | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 08:59 | Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer | Andrew Haley |
| 07:37 | Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer | Jonathan Wakely |
| 06:15 | how to detect that the vector extension is available | Vincent Torri |
| 05:01 | Re: Re : Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Miles Bader |
| 00:41 | Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer | Jeffrey Walton |
| 00:03 | Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer | Jonathan Wakely |
September 27, 2011
| 23:42 | Question on Taming the Optimizer | Jeffrey Walton |
| 18:27 | Re: sizeof(long double) vs. std::numeric_limits and x86-64 vs x86 | Toon Moene |
| 16:47 | Re : Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | charfi asma |
| 16:39 | Re: Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Jeff Law |
| 11:29 | Re: sizeof(long double) vs. std::numeric_limits and x86-64 vs x86 | Michael Veksler |
| 09:35 | Re: Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Amker.Cheng |
| 07:18 | Re: opencl and gcc | naveen yadav |
| 05:12 | Re: Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Miles Bader |
| 05:09 | Re: Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Miles Bader |
| 05:05 | Re: Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Miles Bader |
September 26, 2011
| 22:47 | Re: sizeof(long double) vs. std::numeric_limits and x86-64 vs x86 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 22:11 | sizeof(long double) vs. std::numeric_limits and x86-64 vs x86 | Michael Veksler |
| 18:30 | Re: opencl and gcc | Maxim Kuvyrkov |
| 17:30 | Re: Re : Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Jeff Law |
| 15:35 | Ada Question | jimmie . davis |
| 10:57 | Re: -I- option | Jonathan Wakely |
| 10:50 | Re: -I- option | ali hagigat |
| 09:29 | Re: Re : Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Miles Bader |
| 09:07 | Re : Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | charfi asma |
| 08:22 | opencl and gcc | naveen yadav |
September 25, 2011
| 21:49 | Re: Bug#632003: Finding dlltool using gcc | Stephen Kitt |
| 20:07 | Re: -fprofile-generate and multiple runs | Andi Hellmund |
| 13:50 | Re: -I- option | Jonathan Wakely |
| 13:31 | -I- option | ali hagigat |
September 24, 2011
| 15:11 | Re: Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | David Brown |
| 09:41 | -fprofile-generate and multiple runs | Martin Mitáš |
September 23, 2011
September 22, 2011
| 20:51 | Re: Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 19:59 | Tr : [redundency elimination, code motion, commun expression elimination] GCC optimizations | charfi asma |
| 19:19 | How use linux_kernel init_calls system in a modular application? | dboml |
| 16:08 | Re: swap instruction generation | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 11:11 | å | Mr. Brown |
| 09:03 | Re: swap instruction generation | naga raj |
September 21, 2011
September 20, 2011
| 13:32 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 10:08 | Re: Error in Gcov for ARM | Kai Ruottu |
| 07:46 | Re: Error in Gcov for ARM | Jonathan Wakely |
| 07:19 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Miles Bader |
| 05:14 | Error in Gcov for ARM | Harry Trinta |
September 19, 2011
| 23:01 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 22:38 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Kevin P. Fleming |
| 19:20 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 15:08 | Re: shared library [SOLVED] | Guy Deleeuw |
| 14:35 | error with free format in read/print/write | Luciano |
| 14:14 | shared library | Guy Deleeuw |
| 10:32 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | David Brown |
| 09:57 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | zou wonder |
| 05:47 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Marc Glisse |
| 01:56 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Jeffrey Walton |
September 18, 2011
| 14:38 | Re: Missing "var is used uninitialized" warning? | Georg-Johann Lay |
September 17, 2011
| 20:48 | Re: Missing "var is used uninitialized" warning? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 20:43 | Re: Missing "var is used uninitialized" warning? | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 20:35 | Re: Missing "var is used uninitialized" warning? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 20:33 | Missing "var is used uninitialized" warning? | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 20:21 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Jonathan Wakely |
| 14:58 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Jeffrey Walton |
| 13:48 | Re: error: template with C linkage | Marc Glisse |
| 13:23 | error: template with C linkage | Jeffrey Walton |
September 16, 2011
| 10:35 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | David Brown |
| 10:06 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | Miles Bader |
| 09:47 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | Jonathan Wakely |
| 09:32 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | David Brown |
| 09:21 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | David Brown |
| 09:12 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | zou wonder |
| 08:27 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | Jeffrey Walton |
| 07:54 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | Miles Bader |
| 07:10 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | David Brown |
| 05:41 | Re: compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 05:04 | compile with gcc option -O0 or -O | zou wonder |
September 15, 2011
| 20:35 | Re: [libiberty] problem with unaligned pointers when using md5_process_bytes | Pierre Vittet |
| 17:41 | Re: [libiberty] problem with unaligned pointers when using md5_process_bytes | Steve Ellcey |
| 12:03 | Fwd: [libiberty] problem with unaligned pointers when using md5_process_bytes | piervit |
| 09:07 | Re: No gcj 64 bit compilation support? What the? | Andrew Haley |
| 08:44 | Re: No gcj 64 bit compilation support? What the? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 08:39 | Re: No gcj 64 bit compilation support? What the? | Andrew Haley |
| 08:33 | Re: No gcj 64 bit compilation support? What the? | Chris Burdess |
| 08:16 | No gcj 64 bit compilation support? What the? | Me Myself and I |
| 04:44 | Re: Question about gcj 64 bit compilation. | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 00:16 | Question about gcj 64 bit compilation. | Me Myself and I |
September 14, 2011
| 13:57 | Re: gcc 4.5 powerpc wants r31 | Fabian Cenedese |
| 13:39 | Re: gcc 4.5 powerpc wants r31 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 13:08 | gcc 4.5 powerpc wants r31 | Fabian Cenedese |
| 12:23 | Re: gcc-help - Wednesday, September 14, 2011 | Rashmi Sawardekar |
| 07:50 | Re: gcj onLinux, 32 and 64 bit executables. | Jonathan Wakely |
| 03:41 | gcj onLinux, 32 and 64 bit executables. | Me Myself and I |
September 13, 2011
| 13:09 | Philippe - tarifs des prestations | Philippe SEIGNEZ |
| 09:51 | Re: Incorrect optimized (-O2) linked list code with 4.3.2 | Andrew Haley |
| 09:41 | Re: How not to preprocess system headers | seigneur |
| 07:59 | Re: How not to preprocess system headers | Jonathan Wakely |
| 07:38 | How not to preprocess system headers | seigneur |
| 06:44 | Re: Incorrect optimized (-O2) linked list code with 4.3.2 | pavan tc |
September 12, 2011
| 09:20 | Re: Incorrect optimized (-O2) linked list code with 4.3.2 | Andrew Haley |
| 08:47 | Re: 64 bit long double on i386 arch. | Markus Duft |
| 07:22 | Re: When did relro, now, and nodlopen come into being? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 05:34 | Re: 64 bit long double on i386 arch. | Markus Duft |
| 00:22 | When did relro, now, and nodlopen come into being? | Jeffrey Walton |
September 11, 2011
| 09:17 | Re: disabling the effects of -ffast-math at specific locations | Jonathan Wakely |
| 02:44 | Re: disabling the effects of -ffast-math at specific locations | Tim Prince |
September 10, 2011
| 17:07 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Maciej (Matchek) BliziÅski |
| 11:35 | Re: custom libgcc, libstdc++ namespaces and .so names | Jeffrey Walton |
| 10:18 | custom libgcc, libstdc++ namespaces and .so names | PaweÅ Sikora |
| 02:54 | disabling the effects of -ffast-math at specific locations | Sam Hocevar |
September 09, 2011
September 08, 2011
| 17:40 | Re: Specs file port | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 12:38 | Specs file port | Paulo J. Matos |
| 11:26 | RE: Problem of inline assembly for branch instruction | Naveen H. S |
| 02:48 | Re: -Wall not detecting uninitialized variables | sudhakar govindavajhala |
September 07, 2011
September 06, 2011
| 21:52 | Re: long long size compute failure during make of gcc-4.6.1 on OS X 10.7 Lion | Jonathan Wakely |
| 21:22 | long long size compute failure during make of gcc-4.6.1 on OS X 10.7 Lion | Bruce Hoglund |
| 20:31 | Re: TLS, gcc optimizations, and PIC on x86 | Kevin Klues |
| 13:30 | Re: is that possible? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 13:23 | is that possible? | Leonardo |
| 09:31 | Re: gcc-help Digest 6 Sep 2011 07:10:15 -0000 Issue 3793 | Jonathan Wakely |
| 07:25 | Re: gcc-help Digest 6 Sep 2011 07:10:15 -0000 Issue 3793 | Milind |
| 07:10 | Re: TLS, gcc optimizations, and PIC on x86 | Ian Lance Taylor |
September 05, 2011
| 10:21 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Jonathan Wakely |
| 09:49 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Marc Glisse |
| 08:44 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Maciej BliziÅski |
| 08:31 | Re: Want GCC 4.1.2 to run like SPEC 2006 GCC | Andrew Haley |
| 08:16 | Re: Terminate called after throwing an instance of... | Jeffrey Walton |
| 08:15 | Re: Terminate called after throwing an instance of... | Jeffrey Walton |
| 07:54 | Re: Terminate called after throwing an instance of... | Jonathan Wakely |
| 04:13 | Re: Terminate called after throwing an instance of... | Jeffrey Walton |
September 04, 2011
| 22:50 | Terminate called after throwing an instance of... | Jeffrey Walton |
| 15:38 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Jonathan Wakely |
| 15:32 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:47 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Maciej BliziÅski |
| 02:58 | GCC and LD Hardening Flags | Jeffrey Walton |
September 03, 2011
| 14:01 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Maciej BliziÅski |
| 12:24 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:21 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:02 | Want GCC 4.1.2 to run like SPEC 2006 GCC | Milind |
| 10:22 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Maciej BliziÅski |
September 02, 2011
| 10:44 | Re: Stray \302 error | Avinash Sonawane |
| 10:14 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Marc Glisse |
| 10:01 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Maciej BliziÅski |
| 09:07 | Re: gcc 4.5.3 failed to build a arm cross compiler | Andrew Haley |
| 08:37 | Re: Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Marc Glisse |
| 08:02 | Solaris 10: wchar_iso.h vs cwchar | Maciej BliziÅski |
| 02:04 | Re: exceptions in g++ | Miles Bader |
| 01:46 | gcc 4.5.3 failed to build a arm cross compiler | junfeng dong |
September 01, 2011
| 23:10 | Re: about arrays initialization | uulinux |
| 19:53 | NYC: Movers service 19$/hour/men/truck-no hidden fees | support |
| 17:35 | Re: exceptions in g++ | Jonathan Wakely |
| 16:54 | exceptions in g++ | Miles Bader |
| 13:33 | default system include path search | Cedric Roux |
| 13:22 | Re: Wdisabled-optimizations strange warning | Paulo J. Matos |
| 07:15 | Re: TLS, gcc optimizations, and PIC on x86 | Kevin Klues |
| 05:01 | Re: TLS, gcc optimizations, and PIC on x86 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 04:58 | Re: Attempt to compile abinit-6.6.3 using gcc45 causes "no such instruction" errors | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 01:55 | TLS, gcc optimizations, and PIC on x86 | Kevin Klues |
| 01:18 | Attempt to compile abinit-6.6.3 using gcc45 causes "no such instruction" errors | Anna Ceguerra |
| 01:05 | Re: Preprocessor problem or C++ compliant ? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 00:14 | Re: malloc ( ) | John Fine |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]