This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 4.6.0

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Kai Ruottu <kai dot ruottu at wippies dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:46:54 +0100
Subject: Re: gcc 4.6.0
References: <000301cc22de$fac4b020$a9d3daad@YOUREDC1953E71> <BANLkTikai=WJmj1QsjguBAK0AhXhEY3_kw@mail.gmail.com> <000c01cc22e5$1559bec0$a9d3daad@YOUREDC1953E71> <BANLkTikG8qKmauFA-jQTUDLejbr0=u_6MA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinMGfdjwms+sTxGLYnXhAZ386UoGg@mail.gmail.com> <4DED4983.4020608@wippies.com>

On 6 June 2011 22:41, Kai Ruottu wrote:
>
> The habit to build in an subdirectory of the GCC sources is quite common
> among the RedHat-derived distros, like CentOS :

It's ok if the name of the sub-directory doesn't clash with on that
gets created as part of the build.

> So maybe you guys should start to nag to the Red Hat, CentOS etc. people
> about their way to build GCCs...

They don't ask for help with their builds.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 4.6.0
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- gcc 4.6.0
  - From: Bill Cunningham
- Re: gcc 4.6.0
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: gcc 4.6.0
  - From: Bill Cunningham
- Re: gcc 4.6.0
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: gcc 4.6.0
  - From: kevin diggs
- Re: gcc 4.6.0
  - From: Kai Ruottu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]