This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Strange optimization results
- From: Дмитрий Оксенчук <oksenchuk89 at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:18:27 +0400
- Subject: Strange optimization results
I have tested performance of std::string compare methods and get
strange results. With -O2 optimization std::string::compare 30 times
faster then operator==. With -Os optimization operator== 5 times
faster then std::string::compare. Is this bug or feature?
Full table (time for 10000000 comparisons in seconds):
-O0 -O1 -O2 -O3 -Os
compare 1.069 1.057 0.029 0.025 1.072
operator== 0.461 0.990 0.980 1.022 0.201
g++ (Debian 4.3.4-6) 4.3.4. Test code attached.
#include <iostream>
const char *kStr = "Some Text. Date 09.04.2011. Time 12:32. Code A0.";
bool compare(const std::string &str)
{
std::string test(kStr);
bool result = true;
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
{
//result &= str.compare(test) == 0;
result &= str == test;
}
return result;
}
int main()
{
std::string str(kStr);
if (!compare(str))
{
std::cout << "Failed" << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}