This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
GCC behave different for cv-qualifier function.
- From: zhang qingshan <steven dot zhang54373 at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:26:10 +0800
- Subject: GCC behave different for cv-qualifier function.
std 8.3.2/1 says
Cv-qualified references are ill-formed except when the cv-qualifiers
are introduced through
the use of a typedef (7.1.3) or of a template type argument (14.3), in
which case the cv-qualifiers are ignored
following code is tested at GCC 4.5.0.
template <typename T>
void fun(const T&t);
void foo();
void Test() {
fun(foo);
}
It seems that, fun should be resolved as void (void (&)()), as const
is ignore here.
However, if I try to link this problem, the link complains:
test.cpp:(.text+0x1c): undefined reference to `void fun<void
()()>(void ( const&)())'
Why the fun here is resolved as void fun<void()()>(void ( const &)())
rather than void fun<void()()>(void ( &)()) ?
Thanks.