This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -O more than the sum of its parts?

From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
To: Alexey Salmin <alexey dot salmin at gmail dot com>
Cc: drew stortz <drew dot stortz at gmail dot com>, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:29:05 -0500
Subject: Re: -O more than the sum of its parts?
References: <7088dd691003081924l2c75ec98tca557585304a9e73@mail.gmail.com> <7088dd691003081931w2a9c6618of759c34753b5ac8b@mail.gmail.com> <87a8dc11003082009i2af1fcc5g95916e2471f737ae@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Alexey Salmin <alexey.salmin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> optimizations added. ?Before filing a bug or investigating further, I
>> wanted to ask the list: is my interpretation of the -O switch
>> incorrect?? Is it more than just the sum of those individual
>> optimizations?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2009-10/msg00128.html
>

Also, the post with the full explanation is here, further down in the thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2009-10/msg00134.html

References:
- -O more than the sum of its parts?
  - From: drew stortz
- Re: -O more than the sum of its parts?
  - From: Alexey Salmin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]