This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
- From: Amitava Dutta <ad_101 at yahoo dot com>
- To: GCC Help <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 20:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
- Reply-to: ad_101 at yahoo dot com
Ran "make -k check" without -j option and also fixed
a reference error for /usr/local/bin/stty, the new results are:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 50284
# of unexpected failures 19
# of expected failures 234
# of unsupported tests 656
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 19007
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 144
# of unsupported tests 185
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 29193
# of expected failures 12
# of unsupported tests 135
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 5733
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 80
# of unsupported tests 393
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes 2228
# of unexpected failures 80
# of unsupported tests 9
Guess this is good enough a build.
Best regards
Amitava
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Amitava Dutta <ad_101@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Amitava Dutta <ad_101@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
> To: "GCC Help" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:35 PM
>
> Thanks.
>
> Started the "make -k check" again without -j option,
> will post summary tomorrow.
>
> Best regards
> Amitava Dutta
>
>
> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
> > Subject: Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it
> usable?
> > To: ad_101@yahoo.com
> > Cc: "GCC Help" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:49 AM
> > Amitava Dutta <ad_101@yahoo.com>
> > writes:
> >
> > > I built GCC 4.4.0 on a Sparc Solaris 10.
> > >
> > > The build went thru fine, but most of the tests
> > failed,
> > > last fragment from make check is below.
> >
> > When you run "make check", don't use the -j option.?
> > It is doing
> > something which is not supported by your host
> tools.?
> > make -jN check is
> > only well-tested on GNU/Linux.? If you have the
> time,
> > it would be
> > helpful if you could look into the problems on your
> system
> > and fix them.
> >
> > Ian
> >
>
>
>
>