This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

gfortran -frecord-marker and linking with g++


Hi,

more than a months ago I ran in to the problem described
in the following. Back then, I did not get any responses on gcc-help.
I am not sure if this was because of flaws in my description of the
problem or because gcc-help is not the right place to ask the particular
questions I was asking.

Okay, so here is my problem again, please let me know what you think.

I work with a code that uses both c++ and fortran, hence I compile
with g++ (4.3.2) and gfortran (4.3.2) and link with g++ (4.3.2). For some
old unformatted fortran files, I need to use -frecord-marker=8 with gfortran.
This  works beautifully when compiling and linking (a standalone code) with
gfortran. However, when wrapping a fortran routine in c++ and linking with
g++,  -frecord-marker=8 is disregarded and the executable assumes the
standard record marker position.

Example code to reproduce the problem:

---- file blah.cc:
extern "C" {
 void readtest_();
}

int main(){
  readtest_() ;
}

--- file readtest.F90:

subroutine readtest

 implicit none
 integer ns,ni,nsi

 open(unit=401,file="tst.dat",form='unformatted')
 read(401) ns,ni,nsi
 write(6,*) ns,ni,nsi
 close(401)

end subroutine readtest

--------------------
File tst.dat is a standard old-fashioned unformatted binary fortran
file containing three integers.

Compilation and linking:

g++ -O0 -g -c blah.cc
gfortran -O0 -g -frecord-marker=8 -c readtest.F90
g++ -O0 -g -frecord-marker=8 -o blah blah.o readtest.o -lgfortran

-------------------------

Is this a bug, a feature, or am I doing something wrong here?

Thanks.

 - Christian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]