This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: 64-bit gcc


 
> You're making a distinction where one does not exist.  gcc is gcc.
gcc
> currently supports something like three dozen architectures, all from
a
> single code base.  (And if you count OS variations[1] and bare metal
> systems the number of distinct targets is in the hundreds.)  There is
> no
> "linux gcc version" or "windows gcc version", it's all the same
> codebase
> built with different options or in different environments.
> 
> Some ports might have some local patches that are not in FSF gcc (but
I
> don't think mingw-w64 has any) but those are usually to correct broken
> behavior in certain corner cases so they are things you want.
> 
> Brian
> 
> [1] For example, for the x86 architecture alone: Linux, Darwin/OS X,
> Cygwin, MinGW, {Free,Net,Open}BSD, RTEMS, Vxworks, bare metal, etc.

Does it mean that gcc4.4.0 in mingw-w64 is more like a branch which some
time is going to be merged with main source code, then a fork, which
will live with its own life?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]