This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
February 29, 2008
February 28, 2008
| 20:04 | Re: ra-build.c | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 19:51 | invalid pointer | Bill McEnaney |
| 19:04 | Problem going to GCC from ICC | tmortime |
| 17:44 | ra-build.c | aparna |
| 17:02 | Re: Thumb->ARM->Thumb in inline-wrapped asm? [31740] | dave madden |
| 16:17 | Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale | Andrew Haley |
| 15:56 | RE: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale | Rodrigo Dominguez |
| 15:47 | RE: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale | Rodrigo Dominguez |
| 12:27 | Re: How to rebuild GCC? | Eljay Love-Jensen |
| 11:06 | Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale | Martin Guy |
| 10:28 | Re: GCC 3.3 binary for XScale | Andrew Haley |
| 08:33 | How to rebuild GCC? | Jaishri |
| 07:22 | Re: how to use testsuite to check vectorization capabilities | Tehila Meyzels |
| 06:32 | how to use testsuite to check vectorization capabilities | Jaishri |
February 27, 2008
| 23:39 | Re: Another question. How can I dump gimple IR after optimization pass? | Haifeng He |
| 23:24 | GCC 3.3 binary for XScale | Rodrigo Dominguez |
| 23:19 | Re: Another question. How can I dump gimple IR after optimization pass? | Diego Novillo |
| 22:45 | Re: Another question. How can I dump gimple IR after optimization pass? | Haifeng He |
| 17:43 | Thumb->ARM->Thumb in inline-wrapped asm? | dave madden |
| 14:08 | Re: Aligning function on a page boundary | Sam Ravnborg |
| 14:00 | Re: Aligning function on a page boundary | Igor Bukanov |
| 13:09 | Re: Aligning function on a page boundary | Sam Ravnborg |
| 12:51 | Aligning function on a page boundary | Igor Bukanov |
| 12:11 | denormalized number problem under AIX | Eric Fernandez |
| 10:14 | Re: running library built in gcc 3.4 on another linux box with gcc 2.96 | Andrew Haley |
| 09:16 | Question about DECL_UID of struct field | Haifeng He |
| 05:59 | Re: running library built in gcc 3.4 on another linux box with gcc 2.96 | Tim Prince |
| 01:28 | Re: Optimizations and the -pedantic option | Ian Lance Taylor |
February 26, 2008
| 21:12 | Optimizations and the -pedantic option | Dario Saccavino |
| 19:41 | Re: Need Help With Optimization Options | Andrew Haley |
| 19:20 | Re: gcc-3.4.3 and libstdc++.so.(5|6) | Jens MÃller |
| 17:44 | Re: strict aliasing rule and examples | Andrew Haley |
| 15:38 | Need Help With Optimization Options | Valery Klimov |
| 15:33 | Need help with optimization options | Valery Klimov |
| 14:51 | strict aliasing rule and examples | Mojmir Svoboda |
| 11:18 | Re: running library built in gcc 3.4 on another linux box with gcc 2.96 | Andrew Haley |
| 08:18 | Another question. How can I dump gimple IR after optimization pass? | Haifeng He |
| 07:55 | Re: g++ 4.2.x x86: code generation for __sync_lock_test_and_set() - builtin | Daniel Lohmann |
| 03:32 | running library built in gcc 3.4 on another linux box with gcc 2.96 | Yi Pan |
| 03:08 | How to instrument an initcall? | Haifeng He |
February 25, 2008
February 24, 2008
| 22:50 | gcc-3.4.3 and libstdc++.so.(5|6) | Jens MÃller |
| 19:34 | Re: Same code but different objects layout = different output object size | Felipe Astroza |
| 18:05 | Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees | Andrew Haley |
| 16:55 | Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees | Maurizio Vitale |
| 16:28 | Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees | Bob Plantz |
| 15:56 | Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees | Maurizio Vitale |
| 12:41 | Migrating from gcc 2.95.3 to 3.4.5 in vxWorks on Power Pc platforms | Aparna Upadhya |
| 10:06 | Re: Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)? | PRC |
| 07:09 | Re: gcc 3.2 | Eljay Love-Jensen |
| 02:23 | Re: gcc 3.2 | Mihai DonÈu |
| 00:54 | Re: Re: gcc 3.2 | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
| 00:21 | Re: Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)? | PRC |
February 23, 2008
| 22:45 | Re: Target specific behaviour | NightStrike |
| 22:13 | Re: Target specific behaviour | Brian Dessent |
| 22:05 | Re: Target specific behaviour | NightStrike |
| 19:22 | Re: C main 32/64 bit prologues differ | Bob Plantz |
| 19:08 | Re: Target specific behaviour | David Daney |
| 18:23 | Re: inlined functions and ABI guarantees | Diego Novillo |
| 15:40 | Re: C main 32/64 bit prologues differ | Andrew Haley |
| 12:17 | Target specific behaviour | Kevin Andrà |
| 11:00 | Re: Cannot compile GCC on Ubuntu 7.10 x86_64 | Serge Belyshev |
| 08:41 | Re: Function Lookup | ANOOP |
| 07:42 | Re: Function Lookup | Sven Eschenberg |
| 06:07 | Re: Function Lookup | corey taylor |
| 04:58 | Function Lookup | ANOOP |
| 03:47 | inlined functions and ABI guarantees | Maurizio Vitale |
| 01:05 | Cannot compile GCC on Ubuntu 7.10 x86_64 | Igor Chudov |
February 22, 2008
| 21:23 | Re: Force generation of an uncalled method? | Brian Dessent |
| 20:57 | Re: Force generation of an uncalled method? | stepleton |
| 20:39 | Re: Force generation of an uncalled method? | Brian Dessent |
| 20:00 | C main 32/64 bit prologues differ | Bob Plantz |
| 19:23 | Force generation of an uncalled method? | stepleton |
| 17:59 | Re: How to force gcc to long-call a function (on MIPS)? | David Daney |
| 17:26 | Re: Same code but different objects layout = different output object size | Felipe Astroza |
| 16:04 | Re: Add a new option in gcc | Diego Novillo |
| 13:28 | Re: gcc 3.2 | Eljay Love-Jensen |
| 11:39 | gcc 3.2 | shakeeb ahmed |
| 09:08 | Add a new option in gcc | Haifeng He |
February 21, 2008
February 20, 2008
| 22:25 | Re: How to build a stripped version of gcc | Marcelo Slomp |
| 20:36 | Re: Same code but different objects layout = different output object size | John Love-Jensen |
| 19:54 | Re: C Execution Problem | Tom St Denis |
| 19:53 | Same code but different objects layout = different output object size | Felipe Astroza |
| 19:50 | C Execution Problem | Ponchi |
| 14:37 | Re: openmp + pthreads | Frédéric Bastien |
| 11:42 | Re: Convention about jump ? | Andrew Haley |
| 10:10 | Convention about jump ? | Antoine Eiche |
February 19, 2008
| 21:34 | openmp + pthreads | Haris Saybasili |
| 21:10 | Re: How to instrument a program using GCC | Haifeng He |
| 19:16 | Quadrem Online Registration Invitation - UserName and Password | Godly Thomas John |
| 17:39 | Re: How to forbid a function to use stack? | David Daney |
| 17:03 | Re: AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error | Thomas Mittelstaedt |
| 15:23 | Re: assignment operators for union member classes | John Love-Jensen |
| 14:31 | assignment operators for union member classes | Mike Welsen |
| 14:05 | Re: Correct ordering of write operations | John Love-Jensen |
| 13:38 | Re: How to instrument a program using GCC | Diego Novillo |
| 09:32 | Re: How to forbid a function to use stack? | Andrew Haley |
| 08:58 | How to forbid a function to use stack? | PRC |
| 05:15 | Re: Re: x = ++x + ++x | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
| 04:12 | Re: How to instrument a program using GCC | Haifeng He |
| 03:48 | Re: Problem about mips .data section | robert song |
| 03:07 | Correct ordering of write operations | Ryan Lortie |
| 02:29 | Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target? | Brian Dessent |
February 18, 2008
February 17, 2008
| 20:17 | Re: How to instrument a program using GCC | Diego Novillo |
| 15:54 | Re: trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin | Mirko Vukovic |
| 03:56 | Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target? | Brian Dessent |
| 03:44 | Re: trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin | Brian Dessent |
| 03:17 | trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin | Mirko Vukovic |
| 03:14 | Why does gcc's Makefile have so many targets? | NightStrike |
| 03:06 | gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target? | NightStrike |
| 02:55 | Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64 | NightStrike |
| 02:52 | Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64 | Brian Dessent |
February 16, 2008
| 20:06 | Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64 | Frank W. Miller |
| 00:33 | Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64 | Brian Dessent |
| 00:14 | RE: Building cross compiler for x86_64 | Frank W. Miller |
| 00:00 | Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64 | Brian Dessent |
February 15, 2008
February 14, 2008
February 13, 2008
February 12, 2008
February 11, 2008
February 10, 2008
| 17:14 | Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ? | Andrew W |
| 12:10 | How to build 64-bits Ada library on SPARC Solaris 2.9 ? | Paul Duquennoy |
February 09, 2008
| 04:41 | Re: 64-bit for OS kernel development | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 03:02 | Re: optimization of switch statements on i386 | Godmar Back |
| 02:54 | RE: 64-bit for OS kernel development | Frank W. Miller |
| 02:52 | Re: optimization of switch statements on i386 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 02:43 | Re: optimization of switch statements on i386 | Godmar Back |
| 02:05 | Re: optimization of switch statements on i386 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 01:54 | Re: Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 01:49 | Re: 64-bit for OS kernel development | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 00:31 | optimization of switch statements on i386 | Godmar Back |
February 08, 2008
| 17:20 | Re: unknown directives | Bill McEnaney |
| 16:57 | Re: unknown directives | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 16:52 | Re: Problem about mips .data section | Ian Lance Taylor |
February 07, 2008
| 20:15 | alignment problems with gglobal variables ,GCC for arc | Mike Welsen |
| 17:43 | RE: Building gcc-4.2.3 | Bill McEnaney |
| 16:01 | Re: Optimiziation questions (c++) | Tony Wetmore |
| 13:55 | __sync_compare_and_swap_16 argument alignment | Tim Blechmann |
| 13:45 | Re: inline asm with sse problem | wojtekb82_23 |
| 12:39 | Re: constants question | Lars Poeschel |
| 11:13 | ld: Error: Overflow detected in relocation value | Mike Welsen |
| 09:57 | RE: Building gcc-4.2.3 | Rupert Wood |
| 06:26 | Building gcc-4.2.3 | Bill McEnaney |
| 03:41 | Re: Optimiziation questions (c++) | NightStrike |
| 01:30 | Re: inline asm with sse problem | Tom St Denis |
| 00:43 | inline asm with sse problem | wojtekb82_23 |
| 00:29 | Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3 | Marshall Lake |
February 06, 2008
| 21:54 | Re: dot product optimization | Tim Prince |
| 20:57 | dot product optimization | Robert Henning |
| 19:28 | 64-bit for OS kernel development | Frank W. Miller |
| 17:29 | "R_386_GOTOFF relocation" on x86-solaris2.10 with native ld and GNU as | Michael Haubenwallner |
| 16:53 | Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors | Tom Browder |
| 15:42 | Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors | Jim Stapleton |
| 14:55 | Debugging "no rule to make" messages | Ian S. Worthington |
| 13:38 | Re: constants question | Lars Poeschel |
| 13:37 | Strange performance behaviour | Harald Grossauer |
| 12:40 | constants question | Lars Poeschel |
| 00:53 | unknown directives | Bill McEnaney |
| 00:09 | Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors | Tom Browder |
February 05, 2008
| 23:39 | "expected primary-expression before..." errors | Jim Stapleton |
| 18:01 | [SOLVED] Problem building gcc on solaris9: no rule to make target "all" in gcc-objects/gcc | Paul Duquennoy |
| 17:12 | Preserving GCOV coverage stats after program crash? | Simon Roberts |
| 12:12 | To Generate the pattern for sign_extended addition of 32 bit | Abhishek Roy |
| 11:57 | Re: inline assembly functions - generated code | Robert Kiesling |
| 11:24 | inline assembly functions - generated code | Mike Welsen |
| 05:33 | __sync commands with 16 byte | Roland Schulz |
| 03:24 | Get bigger size | cedip |
| 00:15 | Re: GCC 4.x with Solaris before 2.9 | Robert Kiesling |
February 04, 2008
| 21:09 | what are these errors/how do I get around them: sorry, unimplemented: inter-module optimisations not implemented yet | Jim Stapleton |
| 15:17 | Re: building with host=i686-pc-mingw32 | David Gressett |
| 13:06 | Re: gcc binary compatibility | Eljay Love-Jensen |
| 11:55 | gcc binary compatibility | Alexey Skidanov |
| 10:42 | Problem about mips .data section | robert song |
| 10:18 | RE: GCC 4.x with Solaris before 2.9 | Rupert Wood |
| 08:10 | Problems compiling gcc-4.2.2 in a IBM Power PC 970MP | Joan Josep Iglesias Blanch |
| 07:21 | GCC 4.x with Solaris before 2.9 | Robert Kiesling |
| 03:23 | building with host=i686-pc-mingw32 | Piotr Cychowski |
February 02, 2008
| 19:53 | Strange error with gcc:: Apologies | Lorenzo Pesce |
| 09:11 | Re: gcc binary comptibility | Philipp Thomas |
| 09:06 | Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx | Philipp Thomas |
| 08:59 | Re: Is there another way to put functions to a specifed section? | Sam Ravnborg |
| 08:15 | Is there another way to put functions to a specifed section? | PRC |
| 04:23 | Problem moving module files to other directories | Lorenzo Pesce |
February 01, 2008
| 23:08 | Problem building gcc4.2.2 on Solaris 10 for x64 | Joe Pallas |
| 22:31 | RE: Linking problems with gcc 4.2.2 and AIX 5.2 | Jonathan Saxton |
| 21:32 | Re: gcc for sh-linux: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES | Michael Witten |
| 20:04 | Re: undefined builtin atomic operations in gcc4.2 | Andrew Haley |
| 19:52 | undefined builtin atomic operations in gcc4.2 | Juan Carlos Franzoy |
| 15:41 | Re: conditional based transfer pattern issue in md file | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 14:52 | Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx | David H. Lynch Jr. |
| 13:31 | gcc for sh-linux: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES | Gerard Demm |
| 09:08 | conditional based transfer pattern issue in md file | Sivaprasad.pv |
| 07:54 | Re: Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx | David H. Lynch Jr. |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]