This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

insn does not satisfy its constraints


Hi!

I'm working on a gcc (4.2.1) back-end for a new architecture (no silicon yet). I started with the CRX back-end, because it was the smallest one. Btw, yes, I've read "Porting GCC for dunces" and some parts of the internals document ;-)

Somehow this seems to be a FAQ, but I can't find the correct answer.

The architecture has data and address registers (ala m68k) and for the C code
int c;
void f(void){c=4711;}


 I get the code:
        MV_WI32 R0, #_c         /* movsi Ax */
        MV_WI32 R1, #4711       /* movsi Ax */
        MV_WW   A1, R0  	/* movsi r */
        store_D 0(A1), R1       /* movsi */

The very first line is wrong, because there is a register constraint for address registers:
(define_insn "mov<mode>"
[(set (match_operand:ALLMT 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r, Ax, Rx, m, r")
(match_operand:ALLMT 1 "general_operand" " r, <iF>, <iF>, r, m"))]
""
"@
MV_%M0%M1\t%0, %1 \t/* mov<mode> r */
MV_%M0%M1\t%0, %1 \t/* mov<mode> Ax */
MV_%M0%M1\t%0, %1 \t/* mov<mode> Rx */
store_%M0\t%0, %1 \t/* mov<mode> */
load_%M0\t%0, %1 \t/* mov<mode> */"
[(set_attr "length" "4,4,4,4,4")]
)


The register sets Ax and Rx do not share any registers! Hm, I can only think of placing the symbol in R0 with the third alternative and then move again with the first alternative?!

 This strange thing goes on:
int a, b, c;
void add_var(){c = a + b;}

results in:

add_var.c: In function 'add_var':
add_var.c:20: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints:
(insn 8 24 9 (set (reg:SI 1 R1 [orig:103 a.0 ] [103])
(mem/c/i:SI (reg:SI 2 R2) [0 a+0 S4 A32])) 79 {movsi} (nil)
(nil))
add_var.c:20: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c: 2382


The error happens, because GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS (strict version) detects, that a data register is used like an address register - that's illegal! (BASE_REG_CLASS is defined to Ax_REGS)

So, where can I start my search to resolve this?

Thanks in advance,
Boris Boesler



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]