This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 4.1.0 issue, fixed with 4.1.2?

From: Andrew Haley <aph-gcc at littlepinkcloud dot COM>
To: Holger Eitzenberger <holger at my-eitzenberger dot de>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org, heitzenberger at astaro dot com
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:25:42 +0100
Subject: Re: gcc 4.1.0 issue, fixed with 4.1.2?
References: <871wgia8a6.fsf@kruemel.my-eitzenberger.de> <18029.23167.364862.751541@zebedee.pink> <87wsya8sdd.fsf@kruemel.my-eitzenberger.de>

Holger Eitzenberger writes:
 > Andrew Haley <aph-gcc@littlepinkcloud.COM> writes:
 > 
 > >  > I just stumbled over the issue which is mentioned in
 > >  > 
 > >  > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=commit;h=4eedb20374aadf2e4c8781a47a349b8897a43074
 > >  > 
 > >  > Is this issue fixed with gcc 4.1.2?  If so, is there a bugzilla entry
 > >  > for that?
 > 
 > > Maybe http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27236
 > 
 > I did a rebuild with -fno-unit-at-a-time, which still created the same
 > problematic asm, so I think it's another issue.

Have you got a test case?

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 4.1.0 issue, fixed with 4.1.2?
  - From: Holger Eitzenberger

References:
- gcc 4.1.0 issue, fixed with 4.1.2?
  - From: Holger Eitzenberger
- Re: gcc 4.1.0 issue, fixed with 4.1.2?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: gcc 4.1.0 issue, fixed with 4.1.2?
  - From: Holger Eitzenberger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]