Re: static declaration of foo follows non-static declaration

[Aseem Rastogi <aseem at india dot tejasnetworks dot com>]

I doubt the way you are using foo () in your code. I hope you are aware 
that static functions should be used by prefixing them with class name. 
For ex. if class name is A and function is foo, you should write A::foo ().

If you can show some code, it would be better.

-Aseem.

Dhiraj.Nilange@iflexsolutions.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> During gcc compilation of  C code I am getting these strange errors
> (compile time):-
>
>
> error: static declaration of foo follows non-static declaration
>
> error: previous implicit declaration of foo was here
>
>
> foo is some function here. These errors are surprising, because there is
> only one definition of the function foo. Moreover this code perflectly
> gets compiled using IBM's xlr_c and HP's aCC. So I guess this is gcc
> specific issue. Please help!
>
> Thanks,
> -Dhiraj