This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Test for implementation-defined features of GCC


Vincent Lefevre writes:
 > The GCC 4.1 manual says:
 > 
 > 4.5 Integers
 > ============
 > [...] Signed `>>' acts on negative numbers by sign extension.
 > 
 > but nothing is said about past and future GCC implementations. So,
 > how can I test some implementation-defined features? For instance,
 > something like:
 > 
 > #ifdef SOME_MACRO_DEFINED_BY_GCC_IF_RIGHT_SHIFT_IS_WITH_SIGN_EXTENSION
 > /* code that works only where signed `>>' acts on negative numbers by
 >    sign extension */
 > #else
 > /* fallback portable code (slower) */
 > #endif

Autoconf does this kind of thing.
http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]