This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
pointer to template member function
- From: rodolfo at rodsoft dot org
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:05:27 -0300
- Subject: pointer to template member function
Hi, I´ve come across the following code, which g++ refuses to compile:
// ---
struct A
{
void a() {}
};
struct B : A
{
template <class T> void b() {}
};
typedef void (A::* ptr)();
int main()
{
ptr x = &A::a, //
y = static_cast<ptr>(&B::b<int>); // g++ chokes here
}
// ---
G++ says that
error: invalid static_cast from type
'<unresolved overloaded function type>' to type 'void (A::*)()'
But if I make void b() a non-template class and modify the cast to
static_cast<ptr>(&B::b) it compiles fine. If this is valid, why the
template case isn't?
I'd really say that either casts shouldn't be valid, because in the
non-template case, I could do:
A a;
(a.*x)(); // fine, x points to a member of A, and we are using it with
// an instance of A.
(a.*y)(); // this will have unpredictable results if B::b relies on
// a B's attribute, because we're using B::* with an A
// instance. static_casts should be 'safe', aren't they?
Fortunately, both cases fail when using the default cast without
static_cast. In the template case, compilation fails with:
error: no matches converting function 'b' to type 'void (struct A::*)()'
error: candidates are: template<class T> void B::b()
And in the non template case, compilation fails with:
error: cannot convert 'void (B::*)()' to 'void (A::*)()' in
initialization
Thanks,
Rodolfo Lima.