This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Building OS independant cross compilers (for ia64)
- From: Tom Bachmann <e_mc_h2 at web dot de>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:27:32 +0200
- Subject: Building OS independant cross compilers (for ia64)
- Openpgp: id=AF495A1B; url=home.arcor.de/ness01/0xAF495A1B.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[Please cc me, I'm not registered to the list.]
Hello,
I try to write a little toy kernel for ppc64 and ia64, mainly to get to
know the architectures. Actually this message is about 2 question, one
the one hand, they're tightly related, on the other hand they're
relatively different (therefore I wasn't sure whether to send 2 messages
or not).
The first question is about what target to build in my case.
Conceptually I want a completely OS-independant toolchain only
consisting of binutils and a C compiler, but which target expresses
this? <target>-unknown-unknown doesn't work (system not recognized). For
ppc64, the following configuration options seem to do what I want:
"--prefix=... --target=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c
- --disable-shared --disable-threads --without-headers --disable-libssp
- --disable-libmudflap".
But the ia64 cross toolchains thing seems to be even more tricky. For
what I know it depends on glibc (depending on kernel-headers?), but I
definitely don't want glibc. I don't think it is conceptually right to
depend on linux kernel headers or glibc headers if neither is used. So
what should one pass here? I tried some options
(--target=ia64-unknown-elf, --with-newlib) to workaround this, without
success (always problems compiling fde-glibc.c obviously related to
headers [stdlib.h, link.h] not found).
Thanks for any help.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEuAxEvD/ijq9JWhsRAn5GAJ9BSluP6Li/DjKYeSKDPAlNmG2dGACeIK3/
B0Tz1kWBuwbH0uyhvx+cbK4=
=NT72
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----