This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: mmx/sse builtins

From: "Brian Budge" <brian dot budge at gmail dot com>
To: tprince at myrealbox dot com
Cc: "Matthieu Godet" <matthieu dot godet dot work at hotmail dot com>, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:24:52 -0700
Subject: Re: mmx/sse builtins
References: <BAY19-F20C716CF9BB20FACD8363EAE7F0@phx.gbl> <5b7094580606280833x1a06ec21pe47abf2577e04606@mail.gmail.com> <44A2A692.5060700@sbcglobal.net>

err... oops. I guess my slocate database was out of date, they're still there.

Sorry for the noise.

Anyway, Matthieu, since the *mmintrin* files seem to be sticking
around, I'd suggest you use those instead of the __builtins for
SSE/MMX.

Brian

On 6/28/06, Tim Prince <timothyprince@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Brian Budge wrote:
> A most excellent question.  I'd like to add my own on top of that:  It
> appears that with 4.1.x, the xmmintrin.h, pmmintrin.h, etc... are
> missing.  Will they be back?
>

If you mean you've noticed the tendency of gcc programmers to use
alternates for code which requires data types from those headers when
compiled with commercial compilers, I doubt the trend will reverse.
As those headers appear in my gcc-4.2 installations, I don't think you
mean you suspect they will be removed from gcc.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mmx/sse builtins
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- mmx/sse builtins
  - From: Matthieu Godet
- Re: mmx/sse builtins
  - From: Brian Budge
- Re: mmx/sse builtins
  - From: Tim Prince

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]