This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Qn regarding building an application of smallest size for ARM-11 using gcc
- From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe dot ask at web dot de>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Binesh <bbinesh at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:17:59 +0200
- Subject: Re: Qn regarding building an application of smallest size for ARM-11 using gcc
- References: <e7c749a60606262122t422f1ad7y438ec07952fcd640@mail.gmail.com>
Am Dienstag, 27. Juni 2006 06:22 schrieb Binesh:
> Hi,
>
> We are trying to build an application for ARM-11 using gcc and the
> related auto make suite) that would occupy minimal size.
>
> After adding the -Os and -mthumb we noticed that the size of the
> stripped executable with a dependency on libc.so and libz.so was about
> 87K.
> However, when we statically linked it the stripped size grew to 510 K.
> We removed all code that uses any of string library or stdio and
> instead use only system calls such as ioctl, read, write, mmap and
> munmap. (verified using the symbol dumped out by readelf)
> Despite this the size remains at 510K.
> Trying to link with -nostdlib fails as it refers to undefined
> reference to ioctl, read, write, mmap and munmap.
> Trying to link with -nostartfiles brought down the size to only 502K.
>
> Do the sys call routines need std libs to be linked in?
> Is there an alternative to reduce the size of the statically linked
> exe? (Assuming that it might be difficult to migrate all code to asm)
>
> Would appreciate some help / guidance on this. In case there is
> another forum/ list which would better annswer these question, please
> fwd me to the same.
>
> Thanks!
> -Binesh
I think you have a libc.so problem. This means, you are using glibc, which
really is no emebedded solution library. You should think about using
smaller libraries that better fit you purpose. I found a nice page that
lists some solutions:
http://penguinppc.org/embedded/howto/library.html
bye ingo