This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: exported symbols with hidden attribute
- From: Vincent Torri <Vincent dot Torri at iecn dot u-nancy dot fr>
- To: John Love-Jensen <eljay at adobe dot com>
- Cc: MSX to GCC <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:13:37 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: exported symbols with hidden attribute
- References: <BFE4262F.764D%eljay@adobe.com> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0601070055130.22487@cartan.iecn.u-nancy.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0601111506080.20129@cartan.iecn.u-nancy.fr>
no ideas about the problem ? It just take 5 minutes to check that there's
a problem. No big stuff.
thank you
Vincent Torri
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> did someone tried that library to check that some symbols are exported
> with the hidden flag ?
>
> thank you
>
> Vincent
>
>
> On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > yes. It's a sall library:
> >
> > http://www.iecn.u-nancy.fr/~torri/files/eet.tar.bz2
> >
> > once this library is compiled and installed, libeet.a contains
> > eet_data_image_jpeg_header_decode in src/lib/eet_image.c (for example),
> > which is local (it's static). I've tried to force the hidden visibility by
> > all the ways I know (as you might see), but it stays in libeet.a. Some
> > symbols are not present, like _eet_listfree_add, which is perfect, but
> > some others are still there.
> >
> > Is there an explanation ? I recall that I use gcc 4.0.2.
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, John Love-Jensen wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Vincent,
> > >
> > > Do you have a small "for instance" example you can share?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Eljay
> > >
> > >
> >
>