This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: missing libc with -m32

From: Marco Manfredini <mldb at gmx dot net>
To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:29:10 +0000
Subject: Re: missing libc with -m32
References: <60BD7AC787479D47A3D13E42D836101D98B0AE@icex4.ic.ac.uk>

On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:19, Atwood, Robert C wrote:
>
> I had a similar problem with a vendor-installed SUSE distribution, quite
> a number of 32 bit libraries were missing, or, more confusingly, not
> linked in the usual way , ie I might have /usr/lib/libfoo.c.2.1.4 and
> /usr/lib/libfoo.c.2 --> libfoo.c.2.1.4 but no libfoo.c , I've no idea
> the rational for this , perhaps the vendor just did something wrong on
> installing -- but I guess they probably did the default.
>
Fedora doesn't do so either. The rationale is probably, that the 32-bit libs 
are not intended to be linked against, because the corresponding header files 
have not been proven to be model agnostic.

References:
- RE: missing libc with -m32
  - From: Atwood, Robert C

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]