Re: C++ operators in gcc

[Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe dot ask at web dot de>]

Cool Idea.

BYE INGO

Am Montag, 26. September 2005 13:19 schrieb John Love-Jensen:
> Hi Tommy,
>
> In C++, every class some freebies.  If you write this...
>
> class Foo
> {
> };
>
> ...the compiler generates this...
>
> class Foo
> {
> public:
>   Foo();
>   Foo(Foo const&);
>   ~Foo();
>   Foo& operator = (Foo const&);
>   Foo* operator & ();
>   Foo const* operator & () const;
> };
>
> (I presume the definitions of these methods are obvious.)
>
> If you don't want the compiler to generate one-or-more of those functions,
> you could explicitly declare them in a private section, and leave them
> unimplemented.
>
> HTH,
> --Eljay

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature