This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
optimizing variables
- From: "Jonne Zutt" <j dot zutt at ewi dot tudelft dot nl>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:05:57 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: optimizing variables
Dear gcc experts,
In my simulation tool, I use somebody else's run-time library for a
simulation kernel. This run-time library supports threads by allocating a
local array called 'stackarea' and doing all kinds of stuff and long jumps
etc. I don't quite understand.
The library is used many times, it's stable and all bugs are supposed to
be my own fault.
/* Initialise the array, to fool compilers that it is being
* used, so they don't optimize it away.
* BTW don't write to the entire array, copy-on-write mechanism
* make that very slow. (!)
*/
stackarea[0]=0;
// for(i=1; i<STACKSIZE-1; i++) stackarea[i]=stackarea[i+1];
The system works perfectly fine when compiled without any optimization.
Providing -O for the above file causes a segmentation fault for each
execution very quickly.
Adding the above commented for loop seems to solve this problem.
Now, here's my question:
- I have the feeling this statement stackarea[0]=0 might have fooled gcc
version 3 compiler, but my gcc version 4.0.1 DOES optimize this strange
array away. Is that correct?
- How can I easily check whether a variable has been optimized away, and
how can I avoid this? (e.g. should I write stackarea[random(0,N)] = 0 or
is there a more neat way).
Thanks in advance,
Jonne.
ps >
Just noticed that stackarea[0] = stackarea[STACKSIZE-1] = 0 also does not
"fool" my compiler (i.e. still results in a segmentation fault).