This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
Cc: "Gaurav Gautam, Noida" <gauravga at noida dot hcltech dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:26:30 -0400
Subject: Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
References: <40CC5CC7CDACC048B1299C57025E330CFD5F6C@HSDLNTD1110010.noida.hcltech.com> <20050921141903.GA2832@nevyn.them.org> <43317440.1070403@adacore.com>

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:54:56AM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> >I'm not 100% sure what #3 means for enumerators whose value does not
> >fit in the range of "int", but it's pretty clear that the
> >implementation is not allowed to change the type of enumerators.
> 
> Of course an implementation can do whatever it likes in response
> to switches, compiler dependent declarations etc.

Yes, but -fshort-enums is not intended to interfere with C99
compliance.  And nowadays it doesn't.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

References:
- RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
  - From: Gaurav Gautam, Noida
- Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]