This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Reasonable static initialization assurance

From: corey taylor <corey dot taylor at gmail dot com>
To: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe dot ask at web dot de>
Cc: gcc-help at gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:27:38 -0500
Subject: Re: Reasonable static initialization assurance
References: <2e393d080509171015ac28a39@mail.gmail.com> <200509190827.51191.ikrabbe.ask@web.de> <2e393d080509182337a269a30@mail.gmail.com> <200509190906.51583.ikrabbe.ask@web.de>
Reply-to: corey dot taylor at gmail dot com

On 9/19/05, Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@web.de> wrote:
> No I'm telling you that the compiler type plays no part in your problem with
> variable initializations.

Then that's a difference answer.

corey

References:
- Reasonable static initialization assurance
  - From: corey taylor
- Re: Reasonable static initialization assurance
  - From: corey taylor
- Re: Reasonable static initialization assurance
  - From: Ingo Krabbe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]