This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Should I expect a gcc as the output of the build?
- From: "Pavarotti" <casa_verde at excite dot com>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:04:51 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Should I expect a gcc as the output of the build?
- Reply-to: casa_verde at excite dot com
Hello,
After I did
$ make DESTDIR=mydest install
I got gcc under subdirectories of mydest. And gcc is the same files as xgcc. So the conclusion is: gcc is created and installed after the installation.
Creating a cross compiler is my intension.
Thank you all, especially Eljay.
Pavarotti
--- On Tue 03/29, Eljay Love-Jensen eljay@adobe.com wrote:
From: Eljay Love-Jensen [mailto: eljay@adobe.com]
To: casa_verde@excite.com, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:21:38 -0600
Subject: Re: Should I expect a gcc as the output of the build?
Hi Pavarotti,
>1. I believe I have met the prerequisites. I have been programing and compiling other applications, drivers, and kernel images without problems. What else could I have missed?
I don't know.
2. My output has an xgcc. What is xgcc? or where I can find the info?
Is xgcc just the gcc but with a different name? I believe xgcc is GCC built as a cross-compiler. You did add the cross-compiler --target flag, which is for creating a cross-compiler (as per <http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html>).HTH,--Eljay
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!