This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Aliasing rules and the -f[no-]strict-aliasing switches

From: "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel at ginac dot de>
To: <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: <cln-list at ginac dot de>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:22:51 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Aliasing rules and the -f[no-]strict-aliasing switches
Reply-to: <Richard dot Kreckel at ginac dot de>

Last night, I wrote:
> But: As it stands, is the program really wrong?  And: Why does
> -f[no-]strict-aliasing not make a difference.  And should not
> -Wstrict-aliasing issue a warning?

Oh, never mind.  I just realized that this appears to be not an issue of
aliasing but rather of class layout.

Regards
  -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>

References:
- Aliasing rules and the -f[no-]strict-aliasing switches
  - From: Richard B. Kreckel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]