This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: attribute ((mode(TI)))

From: PaweÅ Sikora <pluto at pld-linux dot org>
To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:57:07 +0100
Subject: Re: attribute ((mode(TI)))
References: <E868F053-9026-11D9-A4C2-000A95B62CC6@cs.nyu.edu>

On Wednesday 09 of March 2005 00:07, Victor Shoup wrote:

> So my question is, to anyone who know, is the above incantation
> (and similarly for unsigned types) a fairly reliable way to get
> a 128-bit type on a 64-bit machine with gcc?

use __int128_t type.


-- 
/* Copyright (C) 2003, SCO, Inc. This is valuable Intellectual Property. */

                           #define say(x) lie(x)

References:
- attribute ((mode(TI)))
  - From: Victor Shoup

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]