This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Defining address's offset.
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- To: "Liza Atkin" <latkin at neomagic dot com>
- Cc: "Gcc-Help-FAQ" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 09 Feb 2005 10:10:37 -0500
- Subject: Re: Defining address's offset.
- References: <EFEJKKGFNIACLOPOALJKGEEFCAAA.latkin@neomagic.com>
"Liza Atkin" <latkin@neomagic.com> writes:
> But the main thing is that I followed your advice concerning the
> UNITS_PER_WORD definition and it did not have any influence whatsoever
> on addresses' indexation and I thought maybe you could think of additional
> components that influence the offset.
I am surprised at that. I would expect that changing BITS_PER_UNIT
and UNITS_PER_WORD would do it.
I recommend building the c4x-rtems target, and take a look at the code
and RTL that it generates, and compare it to what you are getting.
That target has similar characteristics.
Ian