Re: AW: problems with make...

[corey taylor <corey dot taylor at gmail dot com>]

Well, I don't exactly see why you would want that.

However, that's an automake, make issue.  I'm not sure if you can
specify a binary in the dependency list though.

Corey


On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:54:42 +0100, Jupp Tscheak <jupp_tscheak@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi corey,
> 
> if a static linked library has changed the whole binary
> should be recomplied. If make notices that any of the sources
> are newer than the binary it recompiles. This behaviour should
> be the same if the static lib is newer than the binary.
> That isn't the case. Can you explain this?
> 
> Jupp
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: corey taylor [mailto:corey.taylor@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Februar 2005 22:44
> An: Jupp Tscheak
> Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: problems with make...
> 
> Jupp,
> 
>   For what behavior are you looking?
> 
> corey
> 
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:40:45 +0100, Jupp Tscheak <jupp_tscheak@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we're building our project with automatic generated Makefiles (using
> > qt's .pro files, although some modules have nothing to do with qt!).
> > The problem is that if a static linked library has changed, it says
> > "nothing to be done for..." (binary file is older than static lib so
> > it should be relinked).
> > Does anyone know how to avoid this behavior (any flags for g++)?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Jupp Tscheak
> >
> >
> 
>