This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Undefined functions in C

On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:52:50PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Can anyone point me to where C99 explicitly disallows a function
> > without a declaration

> C99 disallows a function without a declaration in paragraph 1:
> "The expression that denotes the called function shall have type
> pointer to function returning void or returning an object type other
> than an array type."  This does not permit an undeclared symbol.

Thanks, that clears it up for me.

> As you note, gcc in c99 mode will always give a warning for an
> undeclared function; this is not true in c89 mode.  In c99 mode, the
> compiler will give an error if you use the -pedantic-errors option.
> Or the -Werror-implicit-function-declaration option.  Or the -Werror
> option.

So do you know why if it is against the standard, gcc in with
--std=c99 requires it be explicitly turned into an error?  Is it just
a backwards/cross compatibility thing?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]