Re: Function typedefs have any use?

["Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming at starnetworks dot us>]

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> I guess "pointless" is in the eye of beholder.  I've used that ability
> quite a lot in some projects, where a large number of functions
> sharing the same prototype has to be declared. 

But you still had to repeat the prototypes when defining the functions, 
so it did not provide as much benefit as it could... the declarations 
automatically change when you modify the typedef, but the function 
definitions don't.

> Care to make a concrete proposal?  There is no point in complaining
> if you can't improve over the situation...

Sure, how would I go about doing that? Obviously it would be a GCC 
extension only, but I think it could be useful.

Something as simple as:

typedef char *f_t(char, char, void *);

f_t f;

f(p1, p2, p3)
{
}

This would define function f, taking three parameters (p1, p2 and p3), 
and the return value type and all parameter types would be as specified 
in the forward declaration of the function. If there is no forward 
declaration, this syntax would generate a compile error. If the number 
of parameter does not match the number parameters specified in the 
forward declaration, this would also generate a compile error. All the 
normally available attributes and modifiers would be available as well 
(static, const, pure, etc.).