This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
The order of starfile in specs seems to be important.
- From: Paul Chavent <paul dot chavent at fnac dot net>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:14:05 +0100
- Subject: The order of starfile in specs seems to be important.
Good morning.
I try to compile a toolchain for arm7tdmi (gameboy) providing
binutils-2.15, gcc-3.4.3 and newlib-1.13.0.
I build it under slackware 9.1 with gcc 3.2.3.
I apply a patch to the sources to provide a start code, linkscript and
syscalls for my target.
The build process go well.
I can use the toolchain and build examples (a simple hello world for
example) with it.
The problem is that the examples don't run on the target. I found one
solution and i wonder if it is the good one.
In the file $(PREFIX)/lib/gcc/$(TARGET)/$(GCC_VER)/specs i switch the
order of the startfiles from :
[code]
*startfile:
crti%O%s crtbegin%O%s crt0%O%s
[/code]
to :
[code]
*startfile:
crti%O%s crt0%O%s crtbegin%O%s
[/code] .
Then every thing go well.
My questions are :
Does the order is important ?
If no, where could be the real problem ?
If yes, can i modify it before compiling gcc (within my patch for
example) ?
Thanks.
Paul.