This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Upgrade "may not respond to" warning to error


Hi Scott,

>What's the flag for this message?

I'm not sure. (I haven't familiarized myself with Objective-C. Which is ironic, since I'm an OS X person.)

Refer to ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.1/gcc/Objective-C-Dialect-Options.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.1/gcc/Warning-Options.html

>Is it possible to do something like -Werror on just some warnings?

No. It's possible to doing something similar, using one of three different strategies:

1) edit the GCC source code and make the identified warnings errors. Rebuild your custom GCC.

2) post-process the output (using sed, for instance) and "upgrade" warnings to errors. Not quite the same thing, doesn't abort the compile, but may be "good enough". You can use that in conjunction with grep to detect for the upgraded warnings, and abort a make file by returning a failing error code.

3) have your build process perform two passes. The first pass enables all the warnings you want to see, the second pass enable only the warnings you want to be elevated to errors and turn on the -Werror flag.

Those are just a few ideas off the top of my head.

HTH,
--Eljay


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]