This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: allignment in structures


Hi Purnendu,

>A sizeof( struct abc) gives 3, shouldnot i expect it to be 4?

No, it should be 3 in this case.

The char data type has an alignment of 1.

#pragma pack(2) does not increase alignment requirements, it only decreases them.

>any pointers???

Use GCC __attribute__ with aligned and pack to affect alignment and/or packing, don't use #pragma pack.

// C++ example.
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstddef>
struct Foo
{
    char a __attribute__((aligned(2)));
    char b __attribute__((aligned(2)));
    long c __attribute__((packed));
    char d;
    char e;
};
int main()
{
    printf("Foo.a %d\n", offsetof(Foo, a));
    printf("Foo.b %d\n", offsetof(Foo, b));
    printf("Foo.c %d\n", offsetof(Foo, c));
    printf("Foo.d %d\n", offsetof(Foo, d));
    printf("Foo.e %d\n", offsetof(Foo, e));
}

Note: the aligned attribute has certain restrictions, depending on platform. See the online documentation.

Often, alignment and packing are used to mimic a canonical data structure, which populates the structure using read or fread. I strongly discourage that practice, and encourage having a helper read routine that populates the structure field-by-field from the byte-by-byte data source. Likewise, the inverse for the write routines.

HTH,
--Eljay


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]