This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Omit guard on static objects ?

From: llewelly at xmission dot com
To: hartmut dot schirmer at arcor dot de
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 27 Apr 2004 08:16:31 -0600
Subject: Re: Omit guard on static objects ?
References: <27995117.1083053470687.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail05.arcor-online.net>

hartmut.schirmer@arcor.de writes:

> Hi,
> 
> is there any way to omit the automatic construction guard
> created in
> 
> int foo()
> {
>   static class A a;
> ...
> }

If you define A so that its constructor and destructor are trivial,
    the gaurd will not be generated, unless there is an initializer
    for a.

Otherwise, the gaurd will always be present.

References:
- Omit guard on static objects ?
  - From: hartmut . schirmer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]