This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay at adobe dot com>
Cc: "gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:55:19 +0100
Subject: Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
Organization: Codesourcery LLC
References: <5.2.1.1.0.20030911110503.00bb5d20@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com> <5.2.1.1.0.20030911110503.00bb5d20@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com> <5.2.1.1.0.20030911113059.00bb4a18@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>

Eljay Love-Jensen wrote:

Hi Nathan,

quux is a function taking a (pointer to function taking no args, returning a Foo) argument and returning a Bar

I realize that's what the compiler is interpreting it as. But I believe that the compiler's interpretation of the code is incorrect.

you did not make that clear. the compiler is correct.

nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
         The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

References:
- Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen
- Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]