This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Re: why gcj is slower than jvm

From: "guw" <guw at koal dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:53:32 +0800
Subject: Re: Re: why gcj is slower than jvm

hello Jeff Sturm

thanks.

But.
Where can represent the GCJ runtime performance and compiler optimization?
and
How represent the GCJ runtime performance and compiler optimization?

thanks.

======= 2003-09-03 02:34:00 ：=======

>On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, guw wrote:
>> I write a JAVA programme and compile it with GCJ. then I compare
>> GCJ's performance with JVM'performance,but I discover that the procedure
>> to be GCJ compiled is slower than JVM.
>
>Your example is more of a comparison of runtime performance than compiler
>optimization.  From your results one might conclude that the JVM has a
>better MD-5 implementation than libjava, but little else.
>
>Jeff

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
			

　　　　　　		
　　　　　　　　guw
　　　　　　　　guw@koal.com
　　　　　　　　　　2003-09-03

Attachment: Rabbit.GIF
Description: GIF image

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]