Re: gcc 3.3 and ld ERROR _Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow@GCC_3.3 problem

[school <lucian at ai dot cs dot scitec dot kobe-u dot ac dot jp>]

To everyone who have been so nice to answer.
My apolodgies for the delay in my answer.
I`ve got my compiler fixed.
Yes, I do have several versions of gcc installed, and yes all of 
them have been installed from binaries.But this was not the 
problem (the debian packagers are doing a good job here).
The problem was with libstdc++ itself.
Upgrading it,the packager didn`t overwrite the symbolic link to a previous
version of libstdc++5.so.That`s all.I`ll write to the 
package maintainer at dabian.
Thanks for all the support you`ve shown!

On 11 Jul 2003 00:04:52 -0700
LLeweLLyn Reese <llewelly@lifesupport.shutdown.com> wrote:

> Oliver.Kellogg@t-online.de (Oliver Kellogg) writes:
> 
> > Lucian,
> > 
> > Apparently your search has not found my further postings,
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2003-06/msg00097.html
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2003-06/msg00100.html
> 
> Thank you. I couldn't find those posting either, and I tried several
>     keywords on both google's advanced search and the htDig on gcc's
>     website. 
>     
> 
> > To recap, the problem happens when more than one version of
> > libgcc_s.so is installed on your system. It may then happen
> > that ld is seeing the wrong version first. I.e. it has to do
> > with the order in which system libraries are searched for.
> [snip]
> 
> I got the impression that perhaps Lucian had installed more than one
>     version of gcc with --prefix=/usr . So it may be that libgcc_s.so
>     was overwritten. If this is the case, he will probably have to
>     re-install the appropriate binary package for the gcc version he
>     wants, with what ever optioons are necessary to force apt to
>     install a package supposedly already installed and overwrite
>     existing files.
> 
> 


-- 
Lucian