Re: Backticks (`) in makefile

["Tapu" <anirudha at cmcltd dot com>]

Thanks for both of your replies, Eljay.
It was really helopful for us as we are new to this field.

So you mean to say c++filt  is the only c++ specific utility?.
We are asking this because we have already one binutils(v2.9.1) for a C
cross compiler based on gcc 2.95.3 for a new architecture. We want to
upgrade the same to c++ cross compilation.
One more thing. Do we have to modify backend files we already have for C
Compiler to make it work for C++ Compiler also. I mean target.md, target.c
and target.h files. What I understand from Stallman is that we need not.


"Don't scream for the Change. Become the Change."

.......................................................
Anirudha Sarangi
Real Time Systems Group
R&D, CMC Centre
........................................................
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eljay Love-Jensen" <eljay@adobe.com>
To: "Tapu" <anirudha@cmcltd.com>; "gcc" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: Backticks (`) in makefile


> Hi Tapu,
>
>  >Is libstdc++-V3 compatible with gcc 2.95.3?
>
> As I understand it, no.
>
> GCC 2.95.3 uses libstdc++ v2.10 (or v2.90 for the adventurous, IIRC).
>
> GCC 3.x uses libstdc++ v3.
>
> STLport <http://www.stlport.org/> supports GCC 2.95.3.
>
>  >And also which is the latest stable version of gcc?
>
> I'm using GCC 3.2 on Windows NT / Cygwin.  (GCC 3.2.3 is the most recent
> bug-fix version of GCC 3.2.x.)
>
> I'm using GCC 2.95.3 on Solaris.
>
> I'm using GCC 3.1 on Darwin 6.6 / OS X 10.2.6.
>
> GCC 3.3 is the latest release.  (Release versions of GCC are stable
versions.)
>
> GCC 3.4 is the current bleeding edge, undergoing active development.
>
> HTH,
> --Eljay
>
>
>
>